Title: The Future of Hydrogen Energy and the Debate Over Clean Production
Introduction:
As the world transitions towards renewable energy sources to combat climate change, hydrogen has emerged as a promising option for decarbonizing heavy industries. However, the production of hydrogen using fossil fuels contradicts its clean energy potential. The US government is now facing a crucial decision on how to regulate the production of hydrogen and determine what qualifies as “clean” energy sources.
1. The Lobbying Blitz in Washington:
Energy companies are pressuring the Treasury Department in Washington for clarity on rules that will determine billions of dollars in hydrogen fuel investments. These rules will shape the future of hydrogen production and its integration into the US energy sector. Lobbyists argue that overly stringent regulations could hinder the growth of the hydrogen industry and push investment towards Europe.
2. The Importance of Green Hydrogen:
Green hydrogen, produced by splitting water molecules with clean electricity, is seen as a key fuel for decarbonizing heavy industries like steel and trucking. However, currently, 95% of US hydrogen is made from natural gas, resulting in high carbon emissions. The production and adoption of green hydrogen are crucial to achieving emission reduction targets and transitioning to a clean energy future.
3. Certification of Clean Energy Sources:
One of the main points of debate revolves around how hydrogen producers should demonstrate that the energy they use is truly “clean.” Some industry lobbyists advocate for an “annual matching” system that allows producers to purchase renewable electricity credits to compensate for their energy use throughout the year. This approach enables companies to store excess renewable energy for later use and promotes investments in the US hydrogen sector.
4. The Hourly vs. Annual Accounting Approach:
Opinions are divided on using an hourly or annual accounting system to determine the cleanliness of hydrogen production. While a Princeton University study suggests that hourly clean energy usage coupled with nearby renewable projects results in low emissions, proponents of the annual accounting approach argue that strict hourly standards would render many clean hydrogen projects economically unviable.
5. The Role of Treasury Guidelines:
The Treasury Department is expected to issue tax guidelines next month that will define which hydrogen projects qualify for subsidies. These guidelines will shape the future of the hydrogen industry by determining eligibility criteria, promoting clean energy adoption, and influencing investment decisions.
6. The Views of Different Stakeholders:
Lobbying efforts include not only energy companies but also big oil groups who urge caution in setting strict guidelines. On the other hand, investors and clean energy advocates emphasize the need for genuine decarbonization and fear that lenient rules could hinder the sector’s progress. The Treasury’s leadership in shaping these guidelines will define the path forward for green hydrogen in the United States.
Conclusion:
The future of hydrogen energy hinges on the regulations set by the US government. Striking a balance between promoting investments, ensuring genuine decarbonization, and driving the growth of the hydrogen industry is a complex task. By establishing clear guidelines for clean hydrogen production and incentivizing renewable energy use, the US can position itself as a global leader in the clean energy transition. The decisions made today will shape the trajectory of the hydrogen industry, its contribution to emission reduction targets, and the overall energy landscape of the future.
Summary:
Energy companies in the US are lobbying the Treasury Department over rules that will determine the fate of hydrogen fuel investments worth billions of dollars. The focus of the debate lies in how to define “clean” hydrogen production. While some advocate for strict hourly clean energy usage, others propose an annual matching system that allows the purchase of renewable electricity credits. The Treasury’s upcoming tax guidelines will have a significant impact on the development of the hydrogen industry, as they will define eligibility criteria and shape investment decisions. The decisions made will influence the trajectory of hydrogen production, its role in decarbonizing heavy industries, and the US’s position in the global clean energy transition.
—————————————————-
| Article | Link |
|---|---|
| UK Artful Impressions | Premiere Etsy Store |
| Sponsored Content | View |
| 90’s Rock Band Review | View |
| Ted Lasso’s MacBook Guide | View |
| Nature’s Secret to More Energy | View |
| Ancient Recipe for Weight Loss | View |
| MacBook Air i3 vs i5 | View |
| You Need a VPN in 2023 – Liberty Shield | View |
Receive free hydrogen energy updates
We will send you a myFT daily digest email rounding last Hydrogen power news every morning.
Energy companies have launched a lobbying blitz in Washington over outstanding rules they say will make or break the lawsuit for tens of billions of dollars in hydrogen fuel investments.
The production of green hydrogen, achieved by splitting water molecules with clean electricity, received generous subsidies in last year’s landmark US climate bill. The Treasury Department is expected to issue tax guidelines next month that determine what types of hydrogen projects will be eligible.
But with renewable energy still supplying only a fraction of the national electric grid, companies are pushing for an approach that allows some hydrogen to be made from electricity generated from fossil fuels.
The debate boils down to how hydrogen producers demonstrate that the energy they buy is “clean.” THE treasureThe most stringent proposal involves certifying that every hour of hydrogen production is powered by a zero-carbon energy source, essentially requiring it to be used around the clock.
Industry lobbyists say this would force hydrogen plants to shut down when clean electricity isn’t available. Instead, they want the Treasury to use an “annual matching” system that allows producers to purchase renewable electricity credits in amounts equal to their annual energy use.
Such a scheme would make investments in US hydrogen more attractive, they say, by allowing companies to effectively store green energy generated during surplus periods, such as when the midday sun passes over solar farms, for later use.
“The question based on how the regulations are written [is]’Are we going to continue accelerating in the US or do we put more emphasis in Europe?'” said Andy Marsh, chief executive of Plug Power, who this week signed an industry letter urging the Biden administration to take a “pragmatic approach” with the treasure guide.
Hydrogen, which emits no carbon dioxide when burned, is considered a key fuel for cleaning heavy industries such as steelmaking and trucking. However, 95% of US hydrogen is made with natural gas in a process that creates large amounts of CO₂.
US Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm hailed clean hydrogen as an alternative to conventional generation and outlined a strategy to cut its costs by 80 percent by 2030. Subsidies under last year’s Inflation Reduction Act amount at $3 a kilogram.
Opinions are mixed on the hourly or annual accounting approach. A Princeton University study found that unless hydrogen production is powered by clean energy on an hourly basis and newly built renewable projects located nearby, the process could have higher emission rates than the hydrogen produced from fossil fuels.
“Our business is built on the need to decarbonise,” said Raffi Garabedian, chief executive officer of Electric Hydrogen, a manufacturer of hydrogen electrolysis systems. “If we’re doing stuff, building stuff and taking advantage of the incentives provided without actually decarbonizing, that would be a farce.”
But some investors say the hourly standard would kill the viability of many clean hydrogen projects, which rely on electricity from the grid and would have to shut down during times of day when renewable energy like wind and solar aren’t available. .
About $11 billion was committed to green hydrogen projects in the United States through the end of the decade, according to Rystad Energy estimates. The energy consultancy found that green hydrogen capacity adverts have increased by 53% since the IRA’s approval. A study commissioned by Plug Power found that projected investment would drop by two-thirds by 2035 if the rules were too strict.
“Right now is probably one of the riskiest times in hydrogen development if you decide to invest in a project and the facility presents itself in a way that is not going to benefit the path you have chosen,” said Marina Domingues, principal analyst at the Rystad’s hydrogen.
Phil Musser, vice president of government affairs at NextEra Energy, the largest clean energy developer in the United States, said the Treasury’s leadership would represent a defining moment for green hydrogen in the country. Under more lenient regulations, the company forecasts a $70 billion market for green hydrogen by 2025 and plans to invest $20 billion in the U.S. sector.
Big oil groups have also joined the lobbying effort, with BP and Woodside Energy among the fossil fuel companies that recently wrote to the government to “act with caution” in its guidance. The Edison Electric Institute, which represents utility companies, and the American Clean Power Association have asked the Treasury to apply less stringent short-term time matching rules, similar to the approach taken in the EU.
Requiring projects to meet hourly matching rules would “martyr” the industry before it has a chance to thrive, said Shannon Angielski, chair of the Clean Hydrogen Future Coalition, whose board includes members from BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell.
The hydrogen developers took their argument to John Podesta, the White House official charged with implementing the IRA, and enlisted the support of Joe Manchin, the pro-fossil fuel Democratic senator who helped push the IRA to Congress last year.
“The Treasury is focused on providing clarity to businesses as soon as possible and ensuring this incentive advances the goals of increasing energy security and combating climate change,” the department said.
Threats to abandon investment mark a change of tone from a clean energy sector that has rushed to capitalize on IRA subsidies, committing more than $200 billion to new manufacturing projects since the bill was passed. approved last year.
Treasury guidance “will greatly dictate where the level of interest is and how much of that investment will go to the United States versus other parts of the global economy,” said Adam Peters, head of North America at Air Liquide, the firm French industrial gas company.
Additional reporting by Derek Brower in New York
—————————————————-