Skip to content

ChatGPT Plagiarism College


Tags:

38 thoughts on “ChatGPT Plagiarism College”

  1. The A.I plagiarism detectors do not work. As 9 times out of 10 They say a paper was written by A.I. even when it was written by a human. I’ve had multiple firsthand experiences with this. Please stop saying that they work, they take credit for literally everything.

  2. Just as students are required to learn new procedures and knowledge for a job, professors need to be expected to keep up with modern items as well. This is a clear case of their teacher not knowing enough about AI to do his job correctly.

  3. The thing is ChatGPT has a mentality of insecure child. You can just make it generate a text, ask it "is this text ai generated?", it will answer it is generated or writen by humans, and you can denied it. ChatGPT will assume your answer suggestions is the correct one.

    People expect too much and destroy the thing that help them. Just like everything is fun until some dumbass walk in.

  4. This is a huge problem I've noticed with ChatGPT and some other AIs, not just when asking "did you write this?" but also many other questions and statements, they have a huge "positive bias", to please the user they usually tend to give an affirmative answer instead of denying

  5. there’s no way that ai isn’t being controlled by patrick. its either smart enough to steal literal careers, or dumb enough to run into oncoming traffic, and no in-between.

  6. All you have to do is edit and review the paragraph, don’t be stupid.
    1 check the info for any factual errors
    2 check for soulless writing that sounds inhuman
    3 check for grammatical errors in case it’s a younger a.i.
    4 check for if it actually can be considered plagiarism from other writings or media

  7. Did anyone notice that on the brief screenshots of the emails shown that the professor spelled ChatGPT as “chat GTP”… what a jackass 😂

  8. I have literally no issue with someone not knowing shit about something.

    When they don’t know something but take full swing into it and start harming people from their lack of knowledge, that needs to be put to an immediate and firm stop.

  9. Let me tell you something. There is research paper stating this method as reliable but its specific to chatGPT generated content. It doesn't account for newer models or different models like Gemini. Not that reliable enough.

  10. the moral of the story isn't "don't use AI to write your essays"
    the moral of the story is "don't use a large language model as the basis for accusing someone of academic dishonesty"
    the professor is using a tool improperly and trying to get people kicked out of school because of it, that's just not how chatGPT works at all, there aren't any tools that let you difinitively check whether something is written by AI.

    however, the human mind is actually one of the better means of detection:
    if you spend enough time asking chatGPT to write things, you will notice that chatGPT has a very particular "voice"
    it really likes making lists
    it likes roleplaying, about 90% of the time, it'll use the phrase "as a [occupation]," in the first 2 sentences.
    usually it doesn't have enough info in the prompt to actually elaborate on concrete reasons to care about something, so it has a tendency to say that whatever it's talking about is important, vital, essential, critical, etc.

    once you start noticing these quirks, it sticks out like a sore thumb.
    humans are even better than chatGPT at determining whether a passage was written by chatGPT, also humans usually don't just randomly hallucinate information

Comments are closed.