Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization [SCOTUSbrief]

Anyone pretending this is a political issue, is right, but not in the way they think. The issue is your politicians only have to pass a law granting access, but they have not. It is the fault of the LEFT not acting, (even with foreknowledge of the ruling) that you have lost your access to abortion. I will not weigh in on the ethical aspect, that is yours to work through on your own terms. But blaming the RIGHT (or any other political or ethical position) is myopic and ignorant. Hold your representatives accountable for their actions and inaction alike.

No matter your politics, being truthful about the issues, not mindlessly promoting your values or preconceptions, is the only sustainable way to enact lasting change.

Just inform and allow the fetus parents of what planned Parenthood has been doing, dismantling and selling body parts. I'm sure things will change and fed gov no longer incentivizing trafficking babyparts

This is the best summary of the arguments I've seen yet.
The dissent could have been an opinion piece in the NYT! It contained no actual legal analysis or reasoning and can be summarised as "we like abortion therefore it is a constitutional right"

Human linguistics and the human choice to justify harm by cherrypicking words results in educated authorities choosing words that justify harmful and deadly acts like abuse, torture and murder. Abort means to end a flight or launch. Not to kill a person. But this word was chosen to replace murder. To justify murder and convince the public it is not evil and heinous. Other words used to replace murder are justice, casualty, execution, collateral damage. Intentionally choosing and planning to end a human life is murder. When we want to murder without guilt, we change the word, not the act. We know what we did. It cannot be undone.

The stench of the court can be detected across the planet.

The federalist society <<<<<<

Two bodies two voices

I appreciate your historical and objective explanation of the case law

Using this logic all the rights that Black people, women and LGBTQ+ people have can be taken over night. A change in Supreme Court members shouldn't mean less right for everyone. Most people don't know that they're pregnant at 6 weeks and these states have been tearing away at abortion access for decades. Abortion should be decision between someone and their health care provider, not religious zealots.

You conservative cretins in the Federalist Society and associated religious zealots should keep your toxic beliefs to yourselves. This decision was awful and what was 'egregious', not Roe v Wade.
This has been a part of a long-standing strategy on the part of fascist jurists to rollback 150 years of only very modest progress for women's reproductive rights, LGBTQ, workers and consumer protections, etc.
This is NOT about 'case law' or the Constitution – neither of which you awful duplicitous hypocrites could care less about.
You expel vast amounts of CO2 and intellectual vapor about 'Originalism' but that legal concept is relatively new and did NOT exist at the time our Constitution was drafted, debated, written, and ratified. If the Founders wanted us to interpret the Constitution as if it was still the late 19th century, then WHY in the HELL did they give us the ability to amend it to adapt to a ever-changing society. Why don't we just return to outdoor plumbing while we're at it?
This is not about 'Freedom' or 'Liberty', it's about entitled, privileged old white conservative hypocrites finding trumped-up legal pretexts to preserve their evil hegemony over everyone else.
You're kidding NO ONE except yourselves and your clique and claque of disaffected, delusional dimwits who long for a neo-confederate Fourth Reich in AmeriKKKa.