Wait til all of you learn how to prompt ai … I’m so happy for so many of you because you’re about to become more creative than …
Wait til all of you learn how to prompt ai … I’m so happy for so many of you because you’re about to become more creative than …
Wait til all of you learn how to prompt ai … I’m so happy for so many of you because you’re about to become more creative than ever and more educated and fill in curiosities … this is profound technology .. use it / don’t fear it ☎️
Don't forget your NFT's right Gary
Gary is going to buy the rights to the Jets in the meta verse and pretend it's the same thing
“gary is ai”
okay you clearly don’t get it
This guy is embarrassing. He has a surface level understanding of things but pretends to be an expert in everything 😂
Gary how's your NFTs
Basically the same as the good Ole copy pasta and edit when plagiarizing lol just slightly more streamlined
That's his real voice
Just what we need. More than one gary bot
lol as if there are any actual journalists left apart from a few.
“Historically reference other times in history”
Gary is an AI / EFT / Bitcoin / Internet / motor vehicle / agriculture / wheel / Fire expert
Not to mention you can easily write out any implicit bias in the code. 👌
Lol jobs will be lost
And sure someone else wrote it and it’s plagiarized but I can blame AI and I’m lazy so it’s a win win.
Just wait until these new language models get gatekept by their big tech overlords
But it's 2021 inside gpt so it can't write exactly articles for journalists
🔥
Daily Positivity Energy! Thanks Gary!
Cringe comments
AI: "Dude, you talk too fucking much"
I promise you if you put this it will not give you what you need. You’ll need to prompt it afew times atleast and even then you’ll have to edit, add missing info, find sources etc
This time last year this dude was talking about tickets to events will be an NFT.
Master waffler I give him that much
I completed my homework using ChatGPT…easiest A ever.
now why does he remind me of junior in sin City?
But.. then you have to go and do research to see if the references it came up with are actually valid. Since.. you know.. it’s a large language model. If it has been trained on invalid or incorrect data on a subject (especially plausible with niche subjects. Which are less likely to have good enough and big enough datasets in training), you’re left with bogus.
If the LLM is connected to a search engine for input and can print out source links like Phind does, take a look at what it cites.
the rate of content generation is going to 100x. how are we going to consume all of it 😵💫
its part of the creative process
Let's face it, that article is not a very good article. If you think the articles produced by chatGPT are good, just shows how low the bar is 😂
Screw nfc, buy into ai, get a loan, get a llc, then buy NBC 😂
Gary's I is indeed A.
Everybody knows when you prompt ChatGPT, it generates information and has the potential to make some jobs redundant. This is not a novel point.
Perseco is crap.
Gary, ask ChatGPT how NFT’s are goin
that isnt journalism. actual journalism wont be replaced by chat gpt.
alternate title: “how to create trash (theoretically)”
WOW this is true, I’m the London Times and I want that article🤩
Clown
I don't know who is this person.
Is he homeless?
Comments are closed.