Unlock Editor’s Digest for free
FT editor Roula Khalaf selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
The new UK government’s plans for nationalize railway services Trains are now running faster on parliamentary tracks than most trains on the country’s rickety rail network, a major setback for one of the most iconic Tory privatisations of the 1980s and 1990s. Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Party’s pledge to “act fast and put things right” is commendable; fixing the railways is important not just for passengers but for boosting economic growth. But by prioritising ownership, it is focusing on the wrong issue.
TO bill The bill, which will undergo a lightning third reading on Tuesday, will return franchised passenger rail services to public hands when existing contracts end or reach breaking point, which at least means this renationalisation has a low initial cost. The government says it will produce a more centralised network, under the “guiding mind” from a yet-to-be-created independent body, Great British Railways. It touts the potential for cutting costs by cutting red tape and simplifying the unpopular ticket maze.
The danger, however, is that, as with British Rail in the 1970s, public ownership will mean poor management and cost control, and give more power to the rail unions with whom Labour has just costly settled long-standing pay disputes. Recent experience shows that state control does not guarantee better service. Just ask the long-suffering passengers of Northern Rail, one of four former franchised services that the state has already taken back.
The flawed franchise system created distorted incentives; several large franchises failed after promising excessive revenues. But the Conservative government pledged in 2021 to move to passenger service contracts with private companies, which pay a fee for providing strictly specified services with penalties for failing to meet targets. sensible concept which prevented total nationalization. Several countriesincluding Germany and Sweden, use service contracts for some services. (In Japan famously reliable On the rail network, the private sector takes the lead on almost all routes, albeit with a very different structure to that in Britain.
With about half of the cancellations Blame the owners of infrastructureThe biggest problem facing Britain’s railways is not operator ownership, but limited and declining capacity. This follows years of inconsistent and inadequate government investment in lane infrastructure, much of which was returned to public hands under Network Rail in 2002. Sustained and increased investment in track is vital, but Labour, although it has promised a more detailed rail reform bill in due course, has so far said little on this issue.
The need is So much bigger after then Prime Minister Rishi Sunak last year canceled the remaining northern section of HS2The high-speed project originally ran from London to Manchester and Leeds. Although costs had spiralled, HS2 promised new capacity as well as speed. The government must urgently find other ways to ease congestion on the West Coast Main Line, where commuter and intercity services share tracks in places, and which is vital to the net-zero priority of shifting freight from road to rail. It should study a plan from city mayors and engineering firms for a Cheaper line, financed with private funds along the cancelled Birmingham-Manchester HS2 route.
It would also be helpful if the government clarified its views on the Northern Powerhouse railway, the proposed east-west line linking northern English cities that is key to revitalising services. And it should draw up coherent plans to redirect funds no longer being spent on HS2 to other projects.
In doing so, Labour should take into account the advice of a policy review it commissioned and seek private financing Also. The report, headed by former Siemens UK boss Juergen Maier, recommended new partnerships, similar to those often used in Europe and Asia, involving “blended finance,” where the private sector takes over the execution and recoups the benefits later. In revitalizing the railway, the new British government would do well to create space for more private-sector investment and involvement, not less.