Skip to content

Prince Harry: Denise Shares Her Own Hacking Story | Loose Women

Featured Sponsor

Store Link Sample Product
UK Artful Impressions Premiere Etsy Store



Prince Harry choked up in court yesterday as he gave his final testimony in his lawsuit against Mirror Group newspapers, saying …

source

We’re happy to share our sponsored content because that’s how we monetize our site!

Article Link
UK Artful Impressions Premiere Etsy Store
Sponsored Content View
ASUS Vivobook Review View
Ted Lasso’s MacBook Guide View
Alpilean Energy Boost View
Japanese Weight Loss View
MacBook Air i3 vs i5 View
Liberty Shield View
🔥📰 For more news and articles, click here to see our full list. 🌟✨

👍🎉 Don’t forget to follow and like our Facebook page for more updates and amazing content: Decorris List on Facebook 🌟💯

📸✨ Follow us on Instagram for more news and updates: @decorrislist 🚀🌐

21 thoughts on “Prince Harry: Denise Shares Her Own Hacking Story | Loose Women”

  1. Blimey, she got through a whole 7 minutes without mentioning that she's a Geordie. Of all the trauma and drama she's been through (jobbing actresses have it so tough), that surely must have been the most difficult.

  2. Jane is so right-I simply admire her for sticking to facts-she always does-well done.
    Dennis : you can shout and move your hands as much as you like-you won’t convince anyone without the facts – certainly not me.

  3. Cant stand Jayne, the worst panelist. Can never seem to agree with anyone elses view points, has to contradict everything other panelists say!

  4. Jane is always defending the media she is a part of. She is complicit. I dare say that she can point to the specific people who have or have ordered the hack on not only Harry, but for all the other claimants. And moreover, the way she speaks is as if she's protecting herself. I bet she did it too.

  5. From what i can see on both mainstream and social media, there isnt a single day that goes by where i dont see another awful story written about this couple! Its so disgusting to see and so very intrusive for people who want a private life!

  6. What point is Jane trying to make? Just because the crime of the publisher has been found and punished before, doesn't mean other victims can pursue a case anymore. Also, if you're gonna play devil's advocate, at least be armed with correct information about the difference between a criminal and civil case. .

  7. Gosh, these publishers. Remember when they hacked Milly Dowler's phone and voicemails, and Piers Morgan made one staff apply for a job at the palace so they can get tidbits on the royal family? Then he bragged about it. Sickening how vile they can be for money. The probabilities are stacked up against them, even if the new plaintiffs don't present concrete evidence.

  8. “burden of proof” HOGWASH. Everyone conveniently forgets what happened to Diana and that was 30 years ago. Charles wanting to “be Camilla’s tampon”. They’ve treated the Sussex’s like garbage. As if anyone in the family will admit to treating Meghan worse than Diana was treated. Nobody pulls out of thin air a comment wondering “what color the baby’s skin will be”. I’d be offended just as equally, and I wouldn’t put up with it either. And Miss Paul Burrell has the nerve to an opinion after how much money HE’s made from Diana’s name.

  9. Good on, Denise. What an awful invasion of privacy. It would mess with anyone's sanity. The vitriol that has been spewed at Harry and Megan generated, in some instances, from the comms teams in royal homes does have a racial undertone. Frightening in modern day UK.

Comments are closed.