**Title: Aluminum Producers Raise Concerns Over Loophole in EU Carbon Border Tax**
Introduction:
As the fight against climate change intensifies, European aluminum producers warn of a potential loophole in the EU carbon border tax that could undermine its effectiveness. The carbon border tax, a proposal by the European Union, aims to tax the amount of CO₂ emissions produced in the manufacturing of imported goods within the bloc. However, the loophole allows heavily polluting exporters like China to sidestep the rules and flood the European market with cheap heavy metals and emissions. This article explores the concerns raised by aluminum producers and delves deeper into the potential consequences of this loophole.
1. The Loophole in the EU Carbon Border Tax:
1.1. Scrap Aluminum as a Zero-Carbon Product:
– Under the proposed carbon border tax, scrap aluminum that is remelted can be sold as a zero-carbon product, even if the virgin material was produced using coal or other fossil fuels.
– This incentivizes producers outside the EU to generate as much scrap as possible, which would then be remelted and exported to Europe.
1.2. Greenwashing of Imported Aluminum Products:
– Aluminum companies, including Norsk Hydro and Speira, argue that this loophole allows for widespread greenwashing of imported aluminum products.
– It undermines the effectiveness of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) in preventing carbon leakage.
– Hilde Merete Aasheim, managing director of Norsk Hydro, emphasizes the need to close this loophole to maintain the integrity of the EU’s climate policies.
2. The Environmental Impact of Aluminum Production:
2.1. Energy-Intensive Nature of Aluminum Production:
– Aluminum is known as the most energy-intensive metal in the industry and is often referred to as “solid electricity.”
– The production of aluminum accounts for approximately 3% of global industrial emissions, slightly higher than emissions from aviation.
2.2. The Role of Lightweight Aluminum in Various Sectors:
– Aluminum is vital for building aircraft and automobiles and is used in components for solar energy.
– Its lightweight and strong properties make it a valuable material, but its production contributes significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions.
3. The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM):
3.1. Experimental Phase and Levy Implementation:
– CBAM will initially be introduced free of charge during an experimental phase starting in October of this year.
– Producers will have to pay the levy from 2026.
– The initial phase will cover seven different sectors, including aluminum, iron, steel, fertilizers, and hydrogen.
3.2. Preventing Inferior Manufacturing Processes:
– The aim of CBAM is to prevent products made with cheap but dirtier manufacturing processes from competing with companies within the EU.
– Companies within the EU have to comply with the bloc’s toughest climate laws and pay for pollution under the EU Emissions Trading System.
– The EU officials hope that CBAM will drive faster decarbonization in industrial sectors worldwide.
4. Concerns and Implications:
4.1. Impact on European Aluminum Industry and Competitiveness:
– The loophole in the carbon border tax raises concerns about the competitiveness of European aluminum producers.
– Volker Backs, public relations manager at Speira, warns of CBAM’s negative impact on European production’s broader competitiveness.
– Rising energy costs and the closure of smelting capacities have already devastated the European aluminum industry.
4.2. Opposition from Outside the EU:
– Countries outside the EU contest the carbon border tax, arguing that it disproportionately affects less developed nations highly dependent on exports to the bloc.
– The European Commission is consulting on the final details of CBAM until July 11.
Additional Insights:
To gain a deeper understanding of the subject matter, let’s explore additional insights related to aluminum production, carbon border taxes, and the broader landscape of climate change initiatives.
1. Green Aluminium Initiatives:
– Initiatives like the Aluminium Stewardship Initiative (ASI) promote responsible and sustainable aluminum production throughout the supply chain.
– The ASI works towards reducing the carbon footprint of the aluminum industry by implementing stricter environmental standards.
– Companies adhering to ASI standards can provide a credible and transparent supply of low-carbon aluminum, meeting the demands of climate-conscious consumers.
2. Global Efforts to Tackle Aluminum Emissions:
– The International Aluminium Institute (IAI) collaborates with governments and industry stakeholders to improve sustainability in aluminum production.
– Initiatives, such as the IAI’s “Aluminium Stewardship Initiative,” aim to reduce emissions and promote responsible sourcing.
– These efforts show a collective commitment to decarbonize the aluminum industry and mitigate its environmental impact.
3. Balancing Competitiveness and Environmental Considerations:
– The concerns raised by European aluminum producers highlight the delicate balance between competitiveness and environmental considerations.
– It is crucial to design carbon border tax policies that effectively address climate change while mitigating potential negative consequences for local industries.
– Striking this balance will require ongoing dialogue and collaboration among policymakers, industry representatives, and environmental organizations.
Conclusion:
The concerns raised by European aluminum producers regarding the loophole in the EU carbon border tax shed light on the challenges of balancing environmental objectives with market competitiveness. While the carbon border tax aims to prevent carbon leakage and drive global decarbonization efforts, the potential exploitation of this loophole by heavily polluting exporters poses a significant risk. It is crucial for policymakers to address this issue promptly and effectively to ensure the success of climate change initiatives while safeguarding the competitiveness of European industries.
Summary:
European aluminum producers have warned that a potential loophole in the EU carbon border tax could allow heavily polluting exporters to flood the European market with cheap heavy metals and emissions. The proposed carbon border tax aims to tax the CO₂ emissions produced in the manufacturing of imported goods within the bloc. However, the loophole allows scrap aluminum to be sold as a zero-carbon product, even if it was initially produced using coal or other fossil fuels. This raises concerns about greenwashing and undermines the effectiveness of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. The aluminum industry’s energy-intensive nature and its contribution to global industrial emissions further highlight the importance of addressing this issue. Striking a balance between competitiveness and environmental considerations is necessary to ensure the success of climate change initiatives while supporting European industries.
—————————————————-
| Article | Link |
|---|---|
| UK Artful Impressions | Premiere Etsy Store |
| Sponsored Content | View |
| 90’s Rock Band Review | View |
| Ted Lasso’s MacBook Guide | View |
| Nature’s Secret to More Energy | View |
| Ancient Recipe for Weight Loss | View |
| MacBook Air i3 vs i5 | View |
| You Need a VPN in 2023 – Liberty Shield | View |
Receive free updates on climate change
We will send you a myFT Daily Digest email rounding last Climate change news every morning.
European aluminum producers warn that a loophole in the The EU carbon border tax it will lead heavily polluting exporters like China to sidestep the rules and flood the bloc with cheap heavy metals and emissions.
Under the The carbon border tax proposed by the EUa tax on the amount of CO₂ emissions produced when manufacturing imported goods in the bloc, scrap aluminum that is remelted can be sold as a zero-carbon product even if the virgin material was produced with coal or other fuels fossils.
Aluminum companies including Norsk Hydro and Speira told the Financial Times that the so-called Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) it incentivized producers outside the EU to generate as much scrap as possible which would then be remelted and exported to Europe.
“This loophole allows for widespread greenwashing of imported aluminum products and undermines the effectiveness of CBAM in preventing carbon leakage,” said Hilde Merete Aasheim, managing director of Norway’s Norsk Hydro.
Lightweight and strong, aluminum is vital for building aircraft and automobiles, and is used in components for solar energy. However, it is the most energy-intensive metal known in the industry and is sometimes referred to as “solid electricity.”
Aluminum production accounts for about 3% of global industrial emissions, according to the International Energy Agency. This is slightly higher than the emissions from aviation.
CBAM will initially be introduced free of charge during an experimental phase which begins in October of this year; producers will have to pay the levy from 2026. In the initial phase, it will cover seven different sectors including aluminium, iron, steel, fertilizers and hydrogen.
The aim is to prevent products made with cheap but dirtier manufacturing processes from inferior to companies within the EU who have to comply with the bloc’s toughest climate laws and pay for pollution under the EU Emissions Trading System. EU officials hope it will drive faster decarbonisation in industrial sectors around the world.
In the EU, smelters emit around 6.8kg of CO₂ for every kilogram of aluminium, compared to a global average of 16.1kg of CO2 per kg, according to trade body European Aluminium.
But the loophole threatens to undermine its purpose, critics say.
Ana Šerdoner, senior executive for energy industry and systems at environmental NGO Bellona, said some manufacturers “may use [this loophole] to shuffle their exports a bit and make sure that scrap is remelted and sold in Europe as carbon neutral”.
The claims by European aluminum producers add to concerns about the lack of export rebates containing imported aluminum that had been taxed, finished products such as cars or cans containing highly polluting aluminum allowed without paying for emissions generated in metal production and the loss of free emission rights in the sector.
“The details and current design raise more concerns than opportunities,” said Volker Backs, public relations manager at Speira, a large German aluminum rolling and recycling company, which has warned of CBAM’s impact on broader competitiveness European production.
Paul Voss, head of European Aluminium, said if the measures were badly designed the sector “would be damaged so badly that there would be nothing left to decarbonise and it would not help the planet”.
The European aluminum industry has been devastated by rising energy costs after Russia invaded Ukraine, leading to the closure of about half of the EU’s smelting capacity.
For some, opposition to the CBAM is more fundamental. Nick Keramidas, executive director of European affairs at Greek aluminum producer Mytilineos Energy & Metals, said domestic producers facing rising costs needed a level playing field.
“CBAM threatens to cripple European manufacturing from serving the European and global markets. It would actually cause the problem it seeks to address by causing more carbon to leak,” she said.
The CBAM has been heavily contested by countries outside the EU, who argue that it punishes producers in less developed nations who are economically dependent on exports to the bloc.
The European Commission, which is consulting on the final details of the CBAM until July 11, declined to comment.
Climate capital
Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the coverage of the FT here.
Are you curious about the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Learn more about our scientific goals here
—————————————————-