SHOCKING: Deadly Russian “Alligator” Wreaks Havoc, Endangering Ukraine’s Counter-Offensive – Must Read Now!

Title: The Role of Russian Attack Helicopters in Ukraine’s Counter-Offensive

Introduction:
Russia’s dragon-toothed tank traps, minefields, and fortifications pose significant obstacles for Ukraine’s nascent counter-offensive. However, another formidable enemy lies in the air – the Russian Ka-52 “Alligator” attack helicopter. This article explores the role of Russian attack helicopters in the conflict and highlights the challenges faced by Ukrainian forces. It also emphasizes the need for Western air support and defense systems in Ukraine.

The Threat of Russian Attack Helicopters:
– Russian attack helicopters, such as the Ka-52 “Alligator,” have proven to be a powerful and effective weapon against Ukrainian forces.
– In a battle near Orikhiv, Ukrainian infantry ventured into a minefield and came under fire from Alligators, resulting in the loss of several US-supplied Bradley infantry fighting vehicles and a German-built Leopard 2 tank.
– Images from this battle showcased the formidable obstacles Ukrainian forces must overcome.
– Ukrainian troops, analysts, and Western officials have highlighted the role of Russian aviation, including fighter jets and attack helicopters, in removing Ukrainian armor.
– The lack of frontline air defenses in Ukraine has further exacerbated the threat posed by Russian helicopters.

Ukraine’s Call for Western Support:
– Ukrainian soldiers have reported instances of enemy fighter jets firing on advancing troops using laser-guided bombs from a great distance.
– The use of helicopters to attack armor is a powerful technique employed by Russia, to which Ukraine has no equal.
– Ukraine seeks support from the West, particularly in the form of US Apache attack helicopters and F-16 fighters, to counter the Russian air threat effectively.
– Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy acknowledges the air and artillery superiority of Russia but commends his forces for their determination to press into Russian-controlled territory.

Russia’s Advantage in Southern Ukraine:
– Moscow has gained a temporary advantage in southern Ukraine, particularly in terms of attack helicopters employing long-range missiles against ground targets.
– The continuous competition between aviation measures and countermeasures has resulted in Russia’s advantage in utilizing helicopters as a threat to Ukrainian forces.

Limitations of Ukrainian Air Defenses:
– Ukraine operates several Soviet-era surface-to-air missile systems but lacks sufficient coverage, partly relying on short-range shoulder-fired missiles (Manpads).
– Ukrainian air force pilots have highlighted the ineffectiveness of Manpads at night and the need for systems with sensing and guidance.
– Russian helicopters equipped with anti-tank guided missiles pose a significant threat to Ukrainian forces during counter-offensives.

Ukraine’s Air Defense Challenges:
– Ukrainian forces constantly balance the risk of deploying scarce surface-to-air missile systems closer to the front lines with leaving armored vehicles exposed to Russian fire.
– Losses in the initial battles of the counter-offensive have led Western Allies to rush to supply additional air defense systems and munitions to Ukraine.
– The need to protect major urban areas and industry simultaneously presents a challenge for Ukrainian air defense tasks.

Russian Vulnerabilities and Losses:
– While highly effective, the Ka-52 Alligator is vulnerable to surface-to-air missiles when within range.
– Russia has lost at least 35 attack helicopters since February last year.
– The vulnerability of Russian attack helicopters presents an opportunity for Ukraine to defend against these threats.

Conclusion:
The conflict between Ukraine and Russia has highlighted the significant role played by Russian attack helicopters, particularly the Ka-52 Alligator, in the ongoing counter-offensive. Ukraine faces numerous challenges, including the lack of frontline air defenses and the effectiveness of long-range missile attacks against ground targets. The need for Western support, including the supply of US Apache attack helicopters and F-16 fighters, is crucial to counter the Russian air threat effectively. The vulnerability of attack helicopters to surface-to-air missiles presents opportunities for Ukraine to defend against these threats. However, the situation remains complex, and ongoing efforts are necessary to safeguard Ukrainian forces and support their counter-offensive.

—

Additional Piece: Exploring the Impact of Attack Helicopters in Modern Warfare

Introduction:
Modern warfare involves the utilization of various assets, ranging from infantry and armored vehicles to advanced aviation capabilities. Among these assets, attack helicopters hold a prominent role, offering unique advantages and posing significant threats. This additional piece delves deeper into the impact of attack helicopters in modern warfare, exploring their capabilities, vulnerabilities, and strategic implications.

The Advantages of Attack Helicopters:
– Attack helicopters possess exceptional maneuverability, allowing them to operate in diverse environments and engage targets with precision.
– Equipped with powerful sensors, combat systems, and long-range missiles, attack helicopters can effectively engage both ground and air targets.
– Their ability to hover enables them to locate targets efficiently and engage them from beyond the range of traditional anti-aircraft defenses.

The Threat Posed by Attack Helicopters:
– Attack helicopters pose a significant threat to enemy forces, particularly armored vehicles and ground targets.
– Equipped with anti-tank guided missiles and other potent weaponry, they can neutralize enemy defenses, disrupt supply lines, and inflict heavy casualties.
– Their ability to conduct close air support missions makes them a vital asset for ground troops, providing them with aerial fire support and reconnaissance capabilities.

Vulnerabilities of Attack Helicopters:
– While attack helicopters provide a formidable offensive capability, they are not invincible.
– Surface-to-air missiles pose a significant threat to attack helicopters, as they can be engaged and neutralized when operating within range.
– Effective air defense systems and countermeasures can limit the mobility and effectiveness of attack helicopters.

The Role of Attack Helicopters in Urban Warfare:
– Urban warfare poses unique challenges and requires specialized capabilities, in which attack helicopters play a crucial role.
– Their ability to operate in confined spaces and engage targets with precision is particularly useful in urban environments.
– Attack helicopters can provide close air support to ground troops, minimize collateral damage, and disrupt enemy positions.

Incorporating Attack Helicopters into a Comprehensive Defense Strategy:
– Integration of attack helicopters into a comprehensive defense strategy is essential to maximize their effectiveness.
– This includes robust air defense systems, intelligence gathering capabilities, and coordination with ground forces.
– Close collaboration between ground forces, attack helicopters, and other air assets enhances operational efficiency and mission success.

Conclusion:
Attack helicopters have become a critical component of modern warfare, offering unique advantages, capabilities, and strategic challenges. With their maneuverability, precision firepower, and ability to conduct close air support missions, attack helicopters have reshaped the battlefield. Understanding their strengths, vulnerabilities, and incorporating them within a comprehensive defense strategy is crucial for success in modern conflicts. By exploring the impact of attack helicopters in warfare, we gain insight into their significance and the need to develop effective countermeasures and defense systems.

—————————————————-

Russia’s dragon-toothed tank traps, minefields and multi-layered fortifications are just one set of obstacles to Ukraine’s nascent counter-offensive. Another formidable enemy turns out to be in the air, including the Russian Ka-52 “Alligator” attack helicopter.

In an early battle of the campaign near Orikhiv in Zaporizhzhia province, a company of Ukrainian infantry drove into a minefield and reportedly came under fire from Alligators, losing several US-supplied Bradley infantry fighting vehicles States and a German-built Leopard 2 tank.

It is unclear how many vehicles were destroyed or subsequently recovered. Nor has Kyiv shed any light on how many Ukrainian soldiers have been killed. But the images from that battle, shared by Russian media and pro-war bloggers, spoke strongly about the obstacles Ukrainian forces will have to overcome.

Ukrainian troops, analysts and Western officials have long highlighted the role of aviation, including Russian fighter jets and attack helicopters, in removing Ukrainian armor and the lack of frontline air defenses to deter them.

“I personally saw how, during our assault, the enemy [fighter jet] the planes immediately fired on our advancing troops using laser-guided bombs from a great distance,” said Stas, a soldier with an elite drone surveillance unit that helps infantry regain lost territory in the south of the country. It wasn’t an isolated incident, he said.

Russia’s use of helicopters to attack armor was a “very powerful technique” that Ukraine had no equal, Stas said, imploring the West to supply Ukraine with US Apache attack helicopters, as well to F-16 fighters.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last week paid tribute to his forces for continuing to press into Russian-controlled territory despite Russia’s “air and artillery superiority”.

Earlier this month, Moscow deployed 20 more helicopters, including Alligators, to an airfield near Berdyansk, 100km from Orikhiv, which has become a major base for rotary-wing operations.

“In the constant competition between aviation measures and countermeasures, Russia is likely to have gained a temporary advantage in southern Ukraine, particularly with attack helicopters employing long-range missiles against ground targets,” the tweeted. British defense intelligence at the weekend.

Despite its technical superiority, the Russian Air Force never gained control of the Ukrainian skies thanks to Ukraine’s vast Soviet-era air defenses later augmented by Western systems. Russian fighters who strayed too far from the front line into Ukrainian territory risked being shot down.

Russian fighter planes and helicopters are now exploiting the shortcomings of Ukraine’s frontline air defenses. Kiev operates several Soviet-era surface-to-air missile systems, but has too few to provide full coverage, leaving it partly dependent on short-range shoulder-fired missiles (Manpads) that require the operator to see the target before firing .

“Manpads aren’t very effective at night,” said a Ukrainian Air Force pilot. “We need systems with sensing and guidance: radar or optical-electronic systems,” the pilot added.

Justin Bronk, a senior research scientist at the Royal United Services Institute, a London-based think tank, said Russian helicopters equipped with anti-tank guided missiles “will always pose a much greater threat to Ukrainian forces during a counter-offensive than during periods when Ukraine was defending itself from Russian attacks”.

“They can hover, locate targets, and fire anti-tank guided missiles from beyond the range of shoulder-mounted manpads or anti-aircraft fire,” Bronk said.

This leaves Ukrainian forces having to constantly balance the risk of deploying their scarce surface-to-air missile systems closer to the front lines with the cost of leaving their armored vehicles exposed to Russian fire.

As Russian missile attacks against several Ukrainian cities have intensified since early May, the Ukrainian military has had to maintain their surface-to-air missile systems to protect the civilian population rather than displacing them to the front lines. Losses in the initial battles of the counter-offensive to Ukrainian forces have sparked a rush by the Western Allies to supply additional air defense systems and munitions to Kiev.

Britain said last week that together with the US, Denmark and the Netherlands it was buying “hundreds of short- and medium-range air defense systems”, mostly from the Soviet era, to be delivered in the coming weeks.

On Monday, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that previously promised Franco-Italian SAMP-T systems were now “operational” in Ukraine.

“The most important problem for Ukraine is that we have to perform two air defense tasks at once – to protect major urban areas and industry. . . and the frontline,” said Mykola Bielieskov, a researcher at the Kyiv-based National Institute of Strategic Studies. “It is a challenge as we have a shortage of land [air defences].” Bieliskov warned that those systems could themselves become targets of Russia’s Lancet kamikaze drones.

The Ka-52 helicopter is hardly foolproof. When Russia’s Defense Ministry broadcast video of one hitting a Leopard tank in an open field, Western analysts ascertained that the destroyed target was, embarrassingly for Moscow, a sprayer.

The Alligator is also highly vulnerable to surface-to-air missiles when in range. Russia has lost at least 35 since February last year, according to Oryx, which documents equipment losses during the war. Colonel Yuriy Ignat, a spokesman for the Ukrainian air force, said four had been shot down in the past week.

Ignat downplayed the threat from Russian attack helicopters during the counteroffensive.

“The Ka-52 is by no means a helicopter that establishes air superiority,” Ignat said, nor did it deliver “the kind of decisive firepower on the battlefield.”

The biggest air threat to Ukrainian forces came from Russian fighter jets that had more powerful radars and longer-range missiles than Ukraine’s older Soviet-built planes, Ignat said. The vulnerability of Ukrainian forces has underscored the need for Western-made jets, such as the F-16, he said.

Stas, the frontline drone operator, said Ukraine needed F-16s and US helicopters to protect ground forces.

“Offensive actions require air cover and the most important thing now is the offensive, because if we don’t win this war quickly, if we don’t take back our whole territory, it will drag on and on,” he said.

Additional reporting by John Paul Rathbone in London

https://www.ft.com/content/d8fe8941-3703-433d-ac7a-dab9ba500481
—————————————————-