Europe’s Biggest Companies Express Concerns over Proposed EU Rules on Artificial Intelligence
Dozens of Europe’s biggest companies, including Germany’s Siemens and France’s Airbus, have raised their voices against the proposed EU rules on artificial intelligence. In an open letter signed by over 150 executives, the companies argue that the rules not only risk damaging competitiveness but also fail to address potential challenges.
The Need for Balanced Regulation
The companies emphasize that while they acknowledge the importance of regulation, it should strike a balance between ensuring technological advancement and addressing the concerns about potential risks. They argue that the proposed rules could jeopardize Europe’s competitiveness and technological sovereignty without effectively tackling the challenges faced by the industry.
The executives highlight that overly strict regulation can stifle innovation and hinder Europe’s ability to remain at the forefront of technological advancements. They believe that instead of implementing overly invasive measures, regulators should adopt a risk-based approach that focuses on general principles.
Concerns about Generative AI
One particular area of concern for the signatories is generative artificial intelligence (AI). They argue that the proposed rules would heavily regulate core models, such as chatbots, without considering their various use cases. This one-size-fits-all approach could lead to disproportionate compliance costs and liability risks for companies developing and implementing such systems.
The companies fear that these limitations could result in businesses relocating outside the European Union, investors withdrawing from AI development, and a widening productivity gap with the United States. They stress the urgent need for Europe to actively participate in the AI landscape instead of remaining on the sidelines.
A Call for a Coordinated Regulatory Body
In addition to their concerns, the signatories have proposed the establishment of a regulatory body that consists of industry experts. This body would monitor the implementation of the rules as technology continues to evolve, ensuring that any potential risks are addressed while promoting innovation and competitiveness.
The executives believe that involving industry experts in the regulatory process would lead to more comprehensive standards, governance, and transparency. They argue that an industry-led approach, combined with a light regulatory regime, can foster growth and development in the AI sector.
Europe’s Leading Role in AI Regulation
Responding to the open letter, Dragoș Tudorache, a Member of the European Parliament who played a key role in the development of the proposed rules, expressed disappointment with the signatories’ reactions. He suggested that the companies may not have thoroughly read the text and could be influenced by a few outspoken individuals.
Tudorache highlighted that the European Parliament has already taken into consideration some suggestions made by the companies, including industry-led processes for setting standards, industry involvement in governance, and a light regulatory regime that emphasizes transparency. He emphasized that these proposals are already part of the ongoing discussions within the European Parliament.
The MEP stressed the importance of Europe’s leading role globally in AI regulation, which should not be undermined by the aggressive lobbying of a few companies. He urged the signatories to engage in constructive dialogue and work together to refine the proposed rules for the benefit of all stakeholders.
Looking Ahead: Balancing Regulation and Innovation
As the European Union moves forward with its plans to regulate artificial intelligence more extensively, it faces the challenge of finding the right balance between regulation and fostering innovation. While concerns about potential risks associated with AI are valid, it is essential to ensure that regulations do not hinder Europe’s ability to remain competitive on the global stage.
By adopting a risk-based approach and involving industry experts in the regulatory process, Europe can develop a regulatory framework that guides responsible AI development while allowing for innovation to thrive. Striking a balance between protecting consumer interests and promoting technological advancements is crucial for Europe to maintain its position as a leader in the AI landscape.
Furthermore, it is essential for policymakers to engage in open dialogue with industry stakeholders to understand their perspectives and concerns fully. Collaboration between regulators and businesses can result in regulations that are both effective and practical, ensuring that Europe remains at the forefront of technological innovation and maintains its competitive edge.
Summary:
Dozens of Europe’s biggest companies, including Siemens and Airbus, have voiced their concerns about the proposed EU rules on artificial intelligence. In an open letter signed by over 150 executives, the companies argue that the rules risk damaging Europe’s competitiveness and technological sovereignty without effectively addressing the challenges faced by the industry. The signatories highlight their particular concerns about generative AI and propose the establishment of a regulatory body consisting of industry experts to monitor implementation of the rules. In response, Dragoș Tudorache, an MEP involved in the legislation’s development, suggests that the companies may not have fully understood the proposed rules and emphasizes the European Parliament’s consideration of their suggestions. Moving forward, it is crucial for Europe to strike a balance between regulation and innovation, ensuring that regulations protect consumer interests while promoting technological advancements.
—————————————————-
| Article | Link |
|---|---|
| UK Artful Impressions | Premiere Etsy Store |
| Sponsored Content | View |
| 90’s Rock Band Review | View |
| Ted Lasso’s MacBook Guide | View |
| Nature’s Secret to More Energy | View |
| Ancient Recipe for Weight Loss | View |
| MacBook Air i3 vs i5 | View |
| You Need a VPN in 2023 – Liberty Shield | View |
Receive free updates on EU technology regulations
We will send you a myFT Daily Digest email rounding last EU technology regulation news every morning.
Dozens of Europe’s biggest companies, including Germany’s Siemens and France’s Airbus, have spoken out against proposed EU rules on artificial intelligence, saying the rules risk hurting competitiveness but fail to address potential challenges .
The companies said so, in an open letter signed by over 150 executives, to the European institutions TO THE it offered a “chance to rejoin the cutting edge of technology” but too harsh regulation could stifle that opportunity.
“In our assessment, the bill would jeopardize Europe’s competitiveness and technological sovereignty without effectively addressing the challenges we are and will have to face,” said the letter, sent on Friday to the European Commission, Parliament and member states .
EU politicians, after almost two years of discussions, recently agreed on the stricter set of rules on artificial intelligence in the world. The draft text of the Artificial Intelligence Act will serve as a negotiating position between member states and the European Commission.
Meanwhile, concerns are growing about the potential risks of the rapidly developing technology, with regulatory demands rising since November, when OpenAI launched its ChatGPT chatbot, one of the first widely available consumer AI applications.
The signatories, ranging from automaker Renault to the world’s second-largest brewer Heineken, said their concerns were particularly acute about generative AI. The proposed rules would “heavily” regulate core models, which is the technology behind chatbots, “regardless of their use cases,” they added.
Companies developing and implementing such systems would face disproportionate compliance costs and liability risks, the letter said. Such limitations could lead companies to leave the bloc, investors to withdraw from AI development in Europe, and the creation of a “critical productivity gap” with the United States.
“Europe cannot afford to remain on the sidelines”, reads the letter. Instead of focusing the law on generative AI and implementing “strict compliance”, regulators in Brussels should produce a law that limits itself to “general principles in a risk-based approach”.
The rules risk undermining the bloc’s tech ambitions rather than fueling innovation, the letter said.
The companies have asked the EU to set up a regulatory body of industry experts to monitor implementation of the law as technology advances.
The signatories appear not to have read the text and are reacting “under the stimulus of a few,” Dragoș Tudorache, an MEP who led the bill’s development, said in response to the letter.
“It’s a shame that the aggressive lobbying of a few is capturing other serious companies,” he said. This “unfortunately undermines the undeniable lead that Europe has taken” globally on regulation.
Tudorache said the only “concrete” suggestions companies have made in the letter are those that the European Parliament has before it: “an industry-led process for setting standards, governance with industry at the table and a light regulatory regime that calls for transparency. Nothing else.”
—————————————————-