Title: Strengthening the House of Lords: Proposals for Reform
Introduction:
The House of Lords, the UK’s second chamber, has recently come under scrutiny, with concerns raised about its effectiveness, accountability, and transparency. In an interview with the Financial Times, Lord John McFall proposed several immediate reforms to improve the position of the upper house. This article explores those proposals and provides further insights into the ongoing debate surrounding the House of Lords.
1. Scrutiny of Political Peerages:
To enhance the selection process for political candidates, Lord John McFall recommends a more thorough examination of their suitability to sit in the House of Lords. Candidates should commit to active participation as legislators, ensuring their dedication to the role. This proposal aims to address the perception of cronyism and increase public trust in the House of Lords.
2. Strengthening the Nominating Committee:
Lord McFall suggests empowering the House of Lords’ Nominating Committee (Holac) with new powers to bolster the approval process for political candidates. Currently, Holac screens appointments with a focus on fairness, including checks for tax compliance and criminal records. McFall proposes a more rigorous and forensic scrutiny to ensure candidates demonstrate remarkable merit and readiness for the legislative role.
3. Independent and Binding Decision-making:
To enhance the credibility of Holac, Lord McFall proposes transforming it into an independent body, separate from the Cabinet. Further, he suggests giving Holac binding decision-making authority rather than advisory power. This increased autonomy and accountability could ensure a fairer and more transparent selection process for political appointees.
4. Overcoming Reputation Challenges:
Lord McFall acknowledges the negative public perception of the House of Lords. He proposes actively tackling concerns of cronyism and restoring credibility through a new, fair, and sustainable system. By implementing these reforms, the House of Lords aims to quell voter anxieties surrounding nominations and improve its reputation among the general population.
5. Chamber Size Reduction:
With nearly 800 members, the House of Lords is the second-largest legislative chamber globally. Lord McFall asserts that a reduction in the number of peers is necessary. Various proposals, including peer term limits and a “two out, one in” system, have been suggested. However, any size reduction would require consensus between the government and opposition parties.
6. Democratic Legitimacy and Ongoing Debate:
The issue of House of Lords reform has long been a subject of debate between political parties in the UK. While some argue for a fully elected second chamber, others caution against hasty changes that could undermine the effectiveness of parliament. The ongoing dialogue between the ruling Conservatives and the opposition Labour Party indicates that this reform will remain a significant constitutional issue leading up to the next general election.
7. Engagement with Opposition Leaders and Government:
Lord McFall’s proposals have gained attention from policymakers across the political spectrum. He plans to engage with opposition leader Sir Keir Starmer and Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey to discuss further reforms. Lord McFall also met with Chancellor Rishi Sunak to present his recommendations. Though the government is currently in “listening mode,” it has not made specific plans for upper house reform.
Conclusion:
Lord John McFall’s proposals to strengthen the House of Lords offer immediate steps to improve the upper house’s selection process, transparency, and accountability. These recommendations address concerns regarding cronyism, public perception, and chamber size. As the debate on House of Lords reform persists, it remains crucial to strike a balance between democratic legitimacy and the effective functioning of parliament. By implementing thoughtful and measured reforms, the UK can enhance the stature and credibility of its second chamber.
Summary:
In an interview with the Financial Times, Lord John McFall proposed several immediate reforms to strengthen the House of Lords. These include a more thorough scrutiny of political peerages, empowering the Nominating Committee, ensuring independence and binding decision-making, addressing concerns of cronyism, reducing the chamber size, and engaging with opposition leaders and government officials. By implementing these reforms, the House of Lords aims to enhance its effectiveness, transparency, and public trust, while maintaining a balance between democratic legitimacy and legislative efficiency.
—————————————————-
| Article | Link |
|---|---|
| UK Artful Impressions | Premiere Etsy Store |
| Sponsored Content | View |
| 90’s Rock Band Review | View |
| Ted Lasso’s MacBook Guide | View |
| Nature’s Secret to More Energy | View |
| Ancient Recipe for Weight Loss | View |
| MacBook Air i3 vs i5 | View |
| You Need a VPN in 2023 – Liberty Shield | View |
Receive free House of Lords updates
We will send you a myFT daily digest email rounding last The House of Lords news every morning.
Candidates for political peerages should be subjected to a more thorough examination of their suitability to take a seat in the The House of Lords and be required to commit to active participation as a legislator, the UK’s second chamber spokesman urged.
In an interview with the Financial Times, Lord John McFall set out a series of proposals to improve the position of the upper house that could be implemented “immediately” by the government, without the need for controversial legislation.
The project focuses on handing over new powers to the House of Lords’ Nominating Committee (Holac) to strengthen the approval process for political candidates.
The Lord Speaker’s push comes on the heels of the dispute on some of the peerages awarded by former Prime Minister Boris Johnson in his honor list of resignations.
His nominees included Baroness Charlotte Owen, a 30-year-old former aide whose only political experience has been a series of behind-the-scenes jobs. She was formally ennobled earlier this month.
McFall, a former Labor MP, would not be attracted to the suitability of specific colleagues but insisted he wanted a “more vigorous approach” to screening candidates.
Speaking after the upper house sat for its six-week summer break, McFall said: ‘I don’t think the House of Lords is fully understood. But if there is a superficial view of the House of Lords, then it is negative.”
His assessment is confirmed by polls. According to a YouGov poll earlier this year, two-thirds of the British public have low or low trust in the House of Lords, while less than a fifth have high or moderate trust.
Second chamber reform has long been debated by both major political parties, and McFall expects it to be part of the debate ahead of next year’s general election.
“Although reform of the Lords is not high on everyone’s agenda, it will be part of the debate. It’s a big constitutional issue,” he said, noting the ruling Conservatives’ 2019 election manifesto pledge for an overhaul. Opposition leader Sir Keir Starmer said a Labor government would aim to scrap the Lords and replace it with a second elected chamber.
McFall cautioned against carrying out a quick review: “A fully elected house. . . a radical change like that could risk seriously damaging the effectiveness of parliament as a legislative institution”.
He remains an enthusiastic supporter of the role played by the Lords but is determined to improve their reputation. “On the question of cronyism, we need a new, fair and sustainable system.”
Currently, Holac screens political appointments “just to be fair,” including whether they “paid taxes or went to jail,” he said. A tougher process could involve Holac conducting a “more forensic scrutiny” of political candidates to ensure they display a level of “remarkable merit” that warrants elevation to the Lords.
Holac could also have the power to confirm that the candidates were “willing to participate in the House with the skills they have,” he said, pointing to long-standing criticisms that some political appointees, all of whom become life peers, contribute little to the parliament.
Both proposals were made by fellow Tory Lord Philip Norton in a Private Members Bill. However, Rishi Sunak – or a future prime minister – could choose to introduce them as “immediate steps” without legislation, McFall said.
He also called for Holac, which currently reports to Cabinet, to become an independent body and given the power to make its decisions binding rather than advisory.
Additionally, McFall would like to see the limit on the number of fellow crossbench “experts” Holac is allowed to appoint each year lifted.
Before then Prime Minister David Cameron imposed an annual limit of two “experienced” cross-benchers a decade ago, Holac appointed an average of five colleagues a year. McFall said a return to that level would allow for an “upgrade” of the chamber and ensure “a range of skills”.
He suggested these changes could “help quell voter anxiety about the nominations.”
Jess Sargeant, associate director of the Institute for Government, welcomed most of McFall’s proposals as “reasonable and workable,” and called Holac’s lifting of the “expert” limit on appointments “makes a lot of sense.”
However, he warned that asking Holac to judge “subjective” criteria such as the merits of political appointments could put the body in a “difficult” position.
Sargeant also questioned whether such reforms “fundamentally solve what people perceive as the problem with the House of Lords in terms of a lack of democratic legitimacy”.
McFall also identified the bloated chamber size as an area ripe for reform, insisting that the number of coworkers “absolutely” needs to be reduced. The House of Lords has nearly 800 members, making it the second largest legislative chamber in the world after the National People’s Congress of China.
He said any reduction in size would have to be agreed between the government of the day and the opposition parties. Proposals have included term limits for peers and the introduction of a “two out, one in” system.
McFall said he met with Sunak privately this month to discuss lords reform, presenting a recent report he commissioned on reducing the size of the chamber, as well as the nomination proposals he presented to the FT.
He also plans to write to Starmer and Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey during the recess and hopes to meet both in the autumn.
Government officials said Sunak was in “listening mode” but had no plans to push ahead with upper house reform at the moment.
—————————————————-