Title: The Impact of Recent Events in Russia on the Ukrainian Military
Introduction:
The recent failed insurgency led by Warlord Yevgeny Prigozhin in Russia has brought unexpected benefits and potential opportunities for Ukraine as it seeks to push Russian forces out of the south and east of the country. While the insurgency may have saved Russia from possible civil war and regime change, it has also exposed vulnerabilities within the Russian military and damaged morale. This article will delve into the implications of these events on the Ukrainian military, exploring how Ukraine can exploit the distraction and weakened morale of the Russian forces to its advantage.
1. The Prigozhin Coup Threat and Ukrainian Counteroffensive:
a. Prigozhin’s failed insurgency came at an opportune time for Ukraine, as their counteroffensive had made only limited territorial gains.
b. Disappointment on the battlefield raised concerns about the Ukrainian army’s ability to overcome heavily fortified Russian positions.
c. The Prigozhin mutiny exposed divisions within the Russian military and potential disloyalty, highlighting Putin’s vulnerability.
2. Exploiting the Distraction and Damaged Morale:
a. Ukrainian officials see the power struggle in Russia as an opportunity to exploit their enemy’s distraction and damaged morale.
b. Ukraine aims to leverage this situation in the political, informational, and military spheres.
c. Ukrainian troops launched an offensive in multiple directions, making progress in each direction.
d. Unconfirmed reports suggest Ukrainian troops crossed into Russian territory near Kherson, southern Ukraine.
3. Implications for Wagner and the Russian Military:
a. The failed coup threat may result in Prigozhin’s exile to Belarus and the return of his troops to their bases.
b. Wagner, Russia’s most effective military force in Ukraine, will likely face uncertain prospects.
c. Disbanding Wagner could deprive Russia of its significant military capability in Ukraine.
d. The disappearance of Wagner and exile of Prigozhin may alleviate criticism of corruption, incompetence, and bureaucracy within the Russian armed forces.
4. Unity of Command and Loyalty Concerns within the Russian Forces:
a. Prigozhin’s capture of a command center in Rostov-on-Don raised questions about the cohesion of the Russian forces and the loyalty of certain parts of the army.
b. The presence of militias in the Russian army makes unity of command challenging.
c. The rebellion could undermine support for the war both among the Russian military and civilians.
5. Implications for Russia’s War Effort:
a. Prigozhin’s rebellion challenges Putin’s narratives and highlights the fragility of his grip on power.
b. The image of a stable system no longer exists, even with the failed coup.
c. Putin may become hostage to his own game, as the chaotic reaction to the rebellion exposes the weaknesses of an authoritarian system.
Conclusion:
The recent events in Russia, particularly the failed insurgency led by Prigozhin, have provided unexpected benefits and potential advantages for the Ukrainian military. The distraction and damaged morale within the Russian forces present opportunities for Ukraine to exploit, both politically and militarily. However, the future of Wagner and the implications for the Russian military remain uncertain. Unity of command and loyalty concerns further complicate the situation. Ultimately, these events challenge Putin’s narratives and highlight the vulnerability of his regime.
Summary:
The recent failed insurgency in Russia led by Warlord Yevgeny Prigozhin has had significant implications for the Ukrainian military. While the coup threat saved Russia from potential civil war and regime change, it also exposed vulnerabilities within the Russian military and damaged morale. Ukraine aims to exploit the distraction and weakened morale of the Russian forces to push them out of Ukrainian territories. The disbandment of Wagner, Russia’s most effective military force in Ukraine, remains uncertain. The rebellion has further raised questions about the cohesion and loyalty of the Russian forces. The Ukrainian military sees this as an opportunity to make territorial gains and exploit their enemy’s weakened state. However, the repercussions of these events reach beyond the battlefield, challenging Putin’s narratives and highlighting the fragility of his regime.
—————————————————-
| Article | Link |
|---|---|
| UK Artful Impressions | Premiere Etsy Store |
| Sponsored Content | View |
| 90’s Rock Band Review | View |
| Ted Lasso’s MacBook Guide | View |
| Nature’s Secret to More Energy | View |
| Ancient Recipe for Weight Loss | View |
| MacBook Air i3 vs i5 | View |
| You Need a VPN in 2023 – Liberty Shield | View |
Receive free updates on Ukrainian military briefings
We will send you a myFT Daily Summary email summarizing the latest Ukrainian military briefing news every morning.
Warlord Yevgeny Prigozhin’s failed insurgency saves Russia from possible civil war, regime change and the collapse of its war effort – the 1917 revolution scenario evoked by President Vladimir Putin Saturday morning.
But the drama in Russia still brings benefits and potential benefits to Ukraine as it seeks to push Russian forces out of the south and east of the country.
“The morale of the Ukrainian troops is very strong and we are monitoring this situation in Russia closely with our popcorn,” Vitaly Markiv, a Ukrainian national guard officer serving on the frontline, told the Financial Times on Saturday.
The Prigozhin coup threat came at an opportune time for kyiv, whose counteroffensive has made only small territorial gains since it began earlier this month. The disappointment on the battlefield raised concerns about the ability of the Ukrainian army to overwhelm the heavily fortified Russian positions.
The Prigozhin mutiny laid bare Putin’s vulnerability and shone a spotlight on divisions with the Russian military machine and possible disloyalty.
Ukrainian officials said the power struggle in Russia had brought no dramatic changes to the frontline, but had created opportunities to exploit their enemy’s distraction and damaged morale.
A Rostov resident takes a selfie with Evgeny Prigozhin © AP
“We will of course exploit this to the fullest,” said Andriy Chernyak, an official with Ukraine’s military intelligence directorate. “We will use it to our advantage in the political sphere, the informational sphere, militarily.”
Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Hanna Maliar said Kyiv troops “launched an offensive in several directions at the same time” on Saturday. “There is progress in every direction.”
According to unconfirmed reports, Ukrainian troops crossed the Antonivskiy Bridge near Kherson, southern Ukraine, into Russian territory on the left bank of the Dnipro.
A senior EU official said the Russian infighting was the “best counter-offensive we could all hope for. Meanwhile, Ukraine can assess and use Russia’s broken morale to its advantage.
Had Prigozhin supported his rebellion, it might have forced the Kremlin to pull some of its best troops away from the Ukrainian front lines to counter Wagner’s seasoned fighters. This will no longer be necessary. Prigozhin is sent into exile in Belarus and his troops return to their bases.
But what happens to Wagner is unclear. Wagnerian officers who did not take part in the mutiny will be offered regular military contracts. But many others who revolted will be banned and may remain loyal to Prigozhin. Putin may feel he still needs to keep more troops closer to home if Wagner – or other similar militias – are still seen as a potential threat.
If Wagner were disbanded, it would deprive Russia of its most effective military force in Ukraine. It was Wagner’s fighters who carried out much of the heavy fighting in Bakhmut, eastern Ukraine, Russia’s only significant territorial gain since July.
“Wagner was the only successful part of the Russian invasion for a year,” said Andriy Zagorodnyuk, Ukraine’s former defense minister. “And his success was very limited and focused on a small town and his tactics were barbaric even to Wagner’s staff. But they at least achieved something. The Russian army could not.
Wagner’s disappearance and Prigozhin’s exile to Belarus would also end criticism of corruption, incompetence and bureaucracy in the Russian armed forces, easing pressure on the military establishment to address its greatest weaknesses, said Zagorodnyuk.
“So the chances of the Russian military system changing are almost nil.”
Wagner’s forces leave Rostov © REUTERS
Rob Lee, a senior fellow at the US-based Foreign Policy Research Institute, doubted that sidelining Prigozhin’s army would have much impact. It had already withdrawn from Ukrainian operations and is an offensive force while the Russian army is now in defensive mode and functioning relatively well. But Moscow could use Wagner’s rebellion to explain future losses.
“We are still waiting for Ukraine to start committing its reserves and that could happen this week. The Russian military will almost certainly blame any loss of territory this week on what Wagner did, and that could be a pretty effective PR line of sorts to blame Wagner.
Yet Prigozhin’s capture of a command center in Rostov-on-Don with no apparent resistance from Russian troops or the fact that his forces advanced, unhindered, several hundred kilometers towards Moscow in a single day will raise also questions about the cohesion of the Russian forces and the loyalty of certain parts of the army.
“It’s a militia army and that’s becoming more and more evident,” said Omar Ashour, a professor of military studies at the Doha Institute. “It makes unity of command very difficult.”
A man holds the Russian national flag in front of a Wagner military vehicle © AFP via Getty Images
Finally, it is possible that the unrest this weekend will undermine Russia’s support for the war, both at the front and among civilians. Prigozhin, who has considerable influence through his Telegram channels, pierced two of Putin’s narratives with his rebellion.
On Friday, he claimed Russia went to war on a lie, directly challenging Putin’s justification for the invasion as a mission to protect Russian speakers. And on Saturday it showed that Putin’s grip on power was more fragile than previously thought.
“The big consequence is that the image of the stable system no longer exists, even if the coup doesn’t succeed,” said Mariia Zolkina of the Democratic Initiatives Foundation, a think tank in Kyiv. “The chaotic reaction of the state shows the real weakness of an authoritarian system. Putin has become hostage to his own game.”
Additional reporting by Henry Foy in Brussels and Roman Olearchyk in Kyiv
—————————————————-