Skip to content

Should F1 change tyre regulations to make racing more competitive? 💭 | Sky F1 Podcast Clips

Featured Sponsor

Store Link Sample Product
UK Artful Impressions Premiere Etsy Store



SUBSCRIBE ▻ http://bit.ly/SubscribeSkyF1 Sky F1’s Karun Chandhok says it’s time for a change in tyre regulations to help make …

source

We’re happy to share our sponsored content because that’s how we monetize our site!

Article Link
UK Artful Impressions Premiere Etsy Store
Sponsored Content View
ASUS Vivobook Review View
Ted Lasso’s MacBook Guide View
Alpilean Energy Boost View
Japanese Weight Loss View
MacBook Air i3 vs i5 View
Liberty Shield View
🔥📰 For more news and articles, click here to see our full list. 🌟✨

👍🎉 Don’t forget to follow and like our Facebook page for more updates and amazing content: Decorris List on Facebook 🌟💯

📸✨ Follow us on Instagram for more news and updates: @decorrislist 🚀🌐

🎨✨ Follow UK Artful Impressions on Instagram for more digital creative designs: @ukartfulimpressions 🚀🌐

🎨✨ Follow our Premier Etsy Store, UK Artful Impressions, for more digital templates and updates: UK Artful Impressions 🚀🌐

48 thoughts on “Should F1 change tyre regulations to make racing more competitive? 💭 | Sky F1 Podcast Clips”

  1. No no, best performance should win. More obligatied pitstops mean more chances of bying lucky/unlucky. I think yellow and red flags and safety car situations are already disrupting the performances of the drivers

  2. They need to change something, racing now is taking all we love about f1 the sound, everything is about saving tyres, fuel, there’s not racing 40 laps saving tyre and no different strategy’s

  3. its a solid idea, more pitstops, seeing more of the pit crew getting involved, seeing more team work as a spectator, but how would it work for wet races ?

  4. No. Are they 1 stopping or 2 or 3? strategists, etc. Always part of the game of F1. If they all have to stop 3 times, like it or not – one step closer to Indycar type regs. Big no. I know where he's coming from but not the answer in my opinion for F1

  5. Keep the 2 compound rule but bring back re fuelling, the rules have changed since re fuelling was banned as the max fuel limit was much higher than it is today!

    Providing the teams can only re fuel within the set amount of fuel for each car what’s the issue?

  6. So far not much racing at the front. Midfield is competitive among themselves. Sky sports team needs an overhaul. Can’t be bothered with pre or post commentary and turn down the volume during the race.

  7. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, Karun! That's what I've been saying for YEARS! It's the simplest change, without adding more resources/strain. The tires are already there. A guaranteed two stopper would make things so much more interesting, especially with free tire choice for the start! Just think about the strategic possibilities. Instead of the undercut, one could now call an under, undercut. Going two compounds softer than your direct opponent at any given stage would blow the door of strategic options off it's hinges!

  8. Another attempt to make something fundamentally boring artistically interesting

    I think we need to stop trying to augment entertainment. The trouble is bigger wheels, DRS, ground effect, tyre compounds etc all its done is make the sport fake.

    Let them go flat out. Make the cars a bit simpler

  9. Ross Brawn & co should take some blame for these cars, even Ross himself said midfield teams can win in these new cars 😂

  10. No stop pushing this idiocy. It has already been studied by Pirelli and the teams and the conclusion was that instead of more variance it would cause more constrains on the optimal strategy. ie. stop trying to push this because you think it sounds right.

  11. Spot on,ive been sayin this for years, im sure teams wont like it but hey,it will be great for the sport and fans….which,whatever the teams say, 'IS' the main objective. At the moment i feel the sport is very predictable and quite boring.

  12. One stop races are simply not great for the sport. Minimum of two stops PLEASE!!! 3 stops would be great. The simple
    Solution is to make just what KC said, they have to use all three options. If they want to be transparent about it, simply make the tire choices for that weekend impossible to produce a one stop race and hopefully 3 by default, that way if someone pulls off a two stopper it’s really something.
    Shortening DRS zones is not helping, and hard compound tires are really killing the excitement. Max should have never been able to take that set so deep in the race. We need variables, jeopardy and excitement. Make them use the softest compounds that won’t last but 5 laps, there should be risk involved. The teams have everything so sorted before the race even starts and droning in lap times to make that one stop strategy work (snooz). Three pit stops is my vote 😊

  13. I want to see racing not gimmicks, why would I want to see drivers be forced on soft tyres that can only last 5 laps? What is the point in that is not racing, and will only lead to accidents. Problem is changing rules and gimmicks. FFS all the sport needed after 2021 was some tweaks, instead they changed the sport to rattle out the drivers brains, destroy their spine, and now the drivers drive like grandpas as the red bull whizzes pass everyone. We have to come up with bright ideas to make F1 interesting by forcing the drivers on crap tyres…booo!

  14. I want tyres that are designed to optimize the balance between performance and longevity. The less pitstops and reliance on team strategy the better IMO. If the slower car or driver wins because of better team tyre strategy, I think it takes away from the sport. The focus should be on the actual racing between the drivers and their machines. The best one wins.

  15. Once again Pirelli are doing things the wrong way round.
    Any new tyres should've been introdiced at the start of the season, not a quarter of the way throught it and on a circuit known for its speed.
    Then we hear about Andretti already building a team for 2025, when Domenicali has already stated that there is no room on the grid for a new team, by all means by an existing team, but no room for a new team.
    Whos lying, Domenicali or the FIA and Andretti?
    If they get a grid slot, then Liberty media has had a massive hand in it and greased a huge amount of palms!
    Its bad enough that we'll have 3 races every season in F1 on American soil let alone having Andretti with a team in the sport.
    He'll cry about the rules (like he did when attempting to drive in F1), he wont be able to take the pressure F1 applies (totally different to that of IndyCar) plus the factory will need to be based in the UK or Europe because the team wont be able to sustain the shipping costs, not unless they have something up their sleeve to purchase the old Lotus factory!
    If thats their route, then they better get a move on, it'll take 18 months to get that site anywhere near ready for a F1 team in 2025.
    Mmmmm I think I can hear Supertramp:
    Dreamer, nothing but a dreamer……

  16. Since Red Bull is usually the fastest with their pit stops, I'm sure they will be pleased with your proposal. Another chance to gain a few seconds on their rivals.

  17. I would have said that the downside is that we won't get the exciting 2 vs 1 stop battles any more, but nowadays everyone is only 1 stopping anyway. Can't remember the last time we had a 2 stopper come from behind to overtake a 1 stopper in the closing laps.

  18. No. No. No. No. No.
    Marginal strategies add some interest but forcing 2 stops decreases the chance of that happening!

    Karun has been confused for 7 years on this topic imo

  19. F1 needs to look at what Indycar does in a number of areas. Push to pass instead of drs, tyre choices and uses, and engines. They go on about making it better and more cost effective, then make simple engines without any hybrid crap on them, that run on sustainable fuels. Oh, and bring back refuelling.

  20. Maybe they shouldn’t be sequential compounds. Maybe c5, c3, and c2. Or 5,4,2. Maybe skip the one that is thought to be the best. 🤷🏼‍♂️

  21. Teams should have more freedom in tyre changes, the limit of two tyres is boring, bring at team’s decision fuel stops back.
    Also get rid of team orders, either the driver has the skill to win or not, protecting a potential champion does not mean he earned it. Example if Perez is only with Red Bill to protect the team and get points, what does it say about Max.

  22. Reducing the size of the tyres back would increase the mileage on the rubber and potencially make 2-stop strategies the preferred choice. Cars would be more nimble with less mass and drivers would be able to see the track better. Increasing tyre sizes was a sizeable mistake!

    Forcing a set of strategies is another mistake. They are remedying the situation with poison.

Comments are closed.