- Anthropic’s lawyer admitted to having used an imaginary source In an ongoing legal dispute between the AI company and the music publishers Universal Music group, Concord and ABKCO Music & Records. The result of the error was that the anthropic data scientist Olivia Chen was accused of quoting an invented academic report to strengthen an argument. An employee of the Athropic law firm blamed and called it an “honest fault of citation” after the inaccurate material was overlooked during a manual review.
A lawyer who represents Anthropic – an artificial intelligence company – who created a wrong quote from the company’s AI chatbot in the middle of an ongoing legal dispute between the company and the music publisher, after a court on Thursday submission.
The incorrect quote was included in an expert report by the anthropical data scientist Olivia Chen last month to defend claims about the company. Anthropic is being sued for the training of its generative AI tools due to alleged abuse.
Although the quote contained the right link, volume, page figures and publication year, the LLM, known as Claude, provided a wrong author and a wrong title, such as from an explanation by Ivana Dukanovic, an employee at Latham & Watkins LLP and lawyer from Record for Anthropic.
The recognition takes place according to a represented lawyer Universal Music GroupConcord and Abbey Music & Records claimed Chen quoted an imaginary academic report to strengthen the company’s argument. While the American judge Susan van Keulen rejected the applicant’s request to ask Chen, said Van Keulen that it was “a very serious and serious problem”, and there was “a world of a difference between a missed quote and a hallucination created by AI,”, “,”, “a world of a difference between Ai,”, “,”, “,” “,” a world of a difference between the hallucination created by AI, “are a world that from AI,”, “,”, “a world of the Ai”, “,” Reuters reported.
In the explanation that the Anthropic Lawyer DukanovicTok accountability for the misfortune, said that according to the submission, it was “an honest citation error and no creation of authority”.
She said the Latham & Watkins team found the article as “additional support for Ms. Chen’s certificate”. Then asked Dukanovic Claude, “to provide a properly formatted legal quote for the article, which led to the hallucinated procurement.
Claude did not properly complete the quote, and the “manual citation control of the lawyer did not record this error,” said Dukanovic.
“This was an embarrassing and unintentional mistake,” said Dukanovic.
Anthropic refused to make further comments on Assets. Latham & Watkins did not immediately respond to a request for comments.
This is the latest lawsuit that a AI company in question because he has supposedly misused copyright -protected materials. Media organizations like Thomson ReutersThe New York TimesAnd Wall Street Journal have filed all lawsuit against various AI companies for copyright infringement.
This story was originally on Fortune.com