Title: Boris Johnson’s Path Back to Parliament: Examining the Challenges and Implications of Johnsonism
Introduction
Boris Johnson, the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, is currently facing an unprecedented indictment for deliberately misleading municipalities. This article explores the concept of “Johnsonism” and whether Johnson has a path back to parliament. It also discusses the role of Rishi Sunak, the current Conservative Party leader, in potentially keeping Johnson out of politics.
The Challenges for Boris Johnson’s Return to Parliament
1. Rishi Sunak’s Influence: The Conservative Party rulebook states that the party council and the incumbent leader have the power to decide who can be a Conservative candidate. As long as Sunak is in power, he can prevent Johnson from returning to parliament.
2. Sunak’s Interests: Sunak’s interests are best served by keeping Johnson out of parliament, as it would be advantageous for his position as the prime minister. Therefore, he is unlikely to pave the way for Johnson’s return.
3. Future Conservative Party Leaders: Even when Sunak is no longer the leader, it is unlikely that his successor would want to give Johnson a way back. They would have to consider whether their interests align with reintroducing a controversial figure who may not have the same popularity and influence as before.
Johnson’s Prospects for a Parliamentary Seat
1. Limited Popularity: While Johnson may be popular in some parts of the country, there are few safe Tory seats where he can be elected. Areas like Henley, Bicester, Woodstock, and Reigate, which were once supportive of Johnson, have now turned against him.
2. Political Direction: Johnson’s interests lie in making money and potentially writing, which would require addressing a conservative American audience. However, this would mean shifting or leaning towards a more right-wing stance, which may not align with the grassroots of the Conservative Party.
The Influence of Johnsonism within the Conservative Party
1. Fictional Johnsonism: Some proponents of Johnsonism describe it as an ideology characterized by economic liberalism, low taxes, openness to trade, and deregulation. However, this idealized version of Johnsonism contrasts with the realities of his tenure.
2. Brexit-Driven Johnsonism: Johnsonism played a significant role in the Conservative victory in 2019, prioritizing ending freedom of movement over trade in the Brexit deal. It also promised more stringent regulation on various issues but faced dissent from party members such as David Frost, who resigned in disagreement.
3. Internal Party Debate: The conflicting interpretations of Johnsonism will shape internal party discussions for the foreseeable future. While the man himself may not return to parliament, his influence and the divide created by his policies will persist.
Expansion of the Topic: Implications and Further Analysis
Johnson’s Legacy: The article suggests that Robert Shrimsley’s column serves as Johnson’s epitaph, implying that his political career has come to an end. However, it is essential to delve deeper into Johnson’s legacy, considering his impact on domestic policies, international relations, and the future of the Conservative Party.
The Role of Leadership: Leadership transitions within the Conservative Party will play a crucial role in shaping the direction of the party. Analyzing potential successors and their policy platforms can provide insights into the future of Conservative leadership after Johnson.
The Challenges of Post-Brexit Politics: Exploring how Johnsonism has influenced British politics post-Brexit can shed light on the challenges the Conservative Party and the nation as a whole face. This analysis can include the impact on trade, immigration policies, and relations with the European Union.
Conclusion: The Lingering Impact of Johnsonism
While Boris Johnson faces challenges in returning to parliament, the concept of Johnsonism will continue to shape the internal debates within the Conservative Party. The conflicting interpretations of Johnson’s policies and the legacy he leaves behind will have long-lasting effects on British politics. Understanding and analyzing the implications of Johnsonism is critical for comprehending the future direction of the Conservative Party and the broader political landscape.
—————————————————-
Article | Link |
---|---|
UK Artful Impressions | Premiere Etsy Store |
Sponsored Content | View |
90’s Rock Band Review | View |
Ted Lasso’s MacBook Guide | View |
Nature’s Secret to More Energy | View |
Ancient Recipe for Weight Loss | View |
MacBook Air i3 vs i5 | View |
You Need a VPN in 2023 – Liberty Shield | View |
This article is an on-site version of our Inside Politics newsletter. Registration Here to receive the newsletter directly in your inbox every day of the week
Good morning. The Conservative Party is haunted by the specter of Boris Johnson, the subject of an unprecedented indictment that has found the former prime minister guilty of deliberately misleading municipalities. Some reflections on Johnsonism, and whether or not he has a path back to parliament, in today’s note.
Inside Politics is edited by Georgina Quach. Follow Stefano on Twitter @stephenkb and please send your gossip, thoughts and feedback to insidepolitics@ft.com
Without poodle
Could Boris Johnson return to parliament? Safe! The insurmountable obstacle in his path back to Westminster at the moment is Rishi Sunak: under the terms of Conservative Party rulebook, the party council and, in practice, the incumbent leader, decides who he is and who he is not. and fit person to be a Conservative candidate. The most recent examples of this came in 2019, when Johnson removed the whip from 21 Tory rebels, though most of the 21 were eventually invited back into the fold.
That said, former Conservative leader Michael Howard’s decision in 2005 to remove the whip from Howard Flight and firing Adrian Hilton as the potential candidate for Slough it’s probably the best analogy because it created bitter divisions among the grassroots, whereas the Johnson purge did not. But what matters most for our purposes is that Sunak can keep Johnson out of parliament. Since the prime minister’s interests are best served by doing so, he will.
Of course, Sunak won’t be the Conservative leader forever. But for his successor to give Johnson a way back, they would have to settle for two things: first, that their interests be well served by giving a way back to parliament to a politician who is no longer the popular, all-conquering force he was once, but a bitterly controversial figure. And secondly, they should decide what their interests are as boss they have been well served by increasing the number of would-be rivals in the rear.
It is certainly possible that the next Tory leader will be tactically bad enough for that to happen, but not, I would say, particularly likely. And he needs a parliamentary seat, and while there are some parts of the country where Johnson is very popular, there aren’t many. To take the safe Tory seats currently up for grabs: Johnson’s old Henley seat, new Bicester seat and Woodstock and Reigate. The first two are firmly in the affluent, largely pro-Remain areas where Johnson was once very popular and is now very unpopular. I don’t think there is any prospect of him being elected to any of those seats.
Also, Johnson will want to make money and will almost certainly want to write. Essentially anywhere he can do these things is to address an audience of conservative Americans, which means shifting or at least leaning towards an audience far to the right of the fairly centrist positions he occupied as a leader. All of which makes me think Robert Shrimsley’s clever and biting column on yesterday’s events is likely serve as Johnson’s epitaph. (To retrieve what the privilege committee report said, Lucy Fisher and Jim Pickard have has collected the main takeaways here.)
What is equally important, however, is that what you might call “Johnsonism” will haunt the Conservative Party for some time, it doesn’t matter, in two ways. The first is the fictional Johnsonism, praised by his former special adviser and minister David Frost, on the pages of the Telegraph:
Economic liberalism, low taxes and spending, openness to trade, economic reform and deregulation. Boris believes it.
Then there’s the very Johnsonism that contributed to the Conservative victory in 2019. The one that prioritized ending freedom of movement over trade in the Brexit deal. The one that promised more stringent regulation of everything from animal rights to climate change, and promised to spend more on public services. The one David Frost resigned from in December 2021.
These two contested views of the Conservative Party will shape much of the internal party debate for some time: although the man himself, I think, is highly likely to be barred from the House of Commons for the foreseeable future.
Now try this
I’m going to see the Arctic Monkeys this weekend. I hope they will play “Sculptures of Anything Goes”, my favorite song from their new album. However you spend it, have a wonderful weekend!
Today’s best stories
-
Barclay calls for “movement” in junior doctors’ pay battle | Steve Barclay has accused the doctors union, the British Medical Association, of failing to compromise on his demands for a 35% wage increase, which the BMA says is needed to reverse 15 years of wage erosion.
-
Delays in the asylum decision-making process | Record of delays in processing asylum applications have led to skyrocketing costsaccording to the UK’s public spending watchdog, which questioned the government’s ability to deliver on its promise to clear the backlog in 2023.
-
Thurrock locals pay the price | The extent of the losses suffered Thurrock council in Essex following failed investments it has “undermined its financial viability,” according to county inspectors who said residents would have to pay higher taxes for essential services for years to come.
-
The new adventure of Idris Elba | Actor Idris Elba will join the ranks of the UK Mad Men advertising executives later support the launch of a marketing and content activity based in London.
https://www.ft.com/content/bc11de9b-f188-4c95-a254-6792860f0874
—————————————————-