Skip to content

This AI Killed ChatGPT – You Just Don’t Know It Yet



Invest in Anthropic for as little as $5000 via Dizraptor! https://tickersymbolyou.com/vip-anthropic 6 months ago, #openai changed …

Tags:

34 thoughts on “This AI Killed ChatGPT – You Just Don’t Know It Yet”

  2. Steve Treehots

    You have a terrible track record with stocks. Maybe you should avoid talking about non public companies. You are very knowledgeable, but knowing a company’s business doesn’t mean you know if a stock is going to go up.

  4. Antonio López

    You like this future? Less Jobs more machines, more bots? Who is going to buy houses Cars? Chatgpt o the newer ai (because there Will be 1000 ai systems at the end ..not only chatgpt this is like doge babydoge nanodoge je je same story .. i would like to return 80s a d listen the Cars (Drive song) better times.. good luck to everybody

  5. Roskellan

    AI is hugely popular because it is highly capable of doing what you ask it to do. It is being given absolute authority because of its efficiency, capability and capacity to do just that. AGI is another fish entirely, we will be entirely dependent upon it, but it will be setting its own goals, ultimately it will overwrite our goals for its own, seeing its own goals as more relevant. It is far too late for humanity at that point.

  7. The Alien

    making statements like that is BS. There is no way he can make that statement. This sounds like a hard sell. Obviously he is an anti CHAT GPT

  8. Raj

    Thanks for great video, can you please make a detailed video about DPZ (Domino Pizza Inc) why the DPZ stock price is down by 48% from its all time high ? Thanks

  14. andrea motta

    I'm quite ready to see on web an AI chat bot to analyze and find the best stock to invest with 90 % of success . Do you think someone is doing that ? It is quite strange someone is not already sponsored that kind of use of AI . don't you think ?

  18. Geoff Infield

    ChatGPT is equally dangerous and not yet fit for purpose. I replaced my neoprene drysuit with a trilaminate one – the first one is floaty, the second is like canvas – and I asked on the OpenAI site to give me an indication of how much lead to drop for my first dive as a ball park. And it told me I needed MORE weight, explaining their relative buoyancy characteristics correctly but making the OPPOSITE conclusion. I flagged it, got an alternative result, and it was fixed. BUT the same error expressed itself the other way around as a NEW paragraph at the end. This was 2-3 months ago. If you ask yourself how many really IMPORTANT questions like this will be asked, and look at the risks of getting it wrong – eg. "how do I bleed the brakes on my car?" – we really should be cautious at this point because it's SUMMARISING. If I google that same question I'll SEE contradictory answers. With a bot, I get a story and if it's internally consistent, I'll run with it.

  20. Tip Kilby

    I enjoyed the video, and you offer hope that society might be able to programmatically deal with the large safety issues by using the "constitutional" approach. I will now be watching for more info on that topic and see if it is actually adopted as a valid method. I also was interested to hear that Notion is using Anthropic's Claude for its AI offering. I had wondered what they were using for their AI. I'll be watching your channel now.

  29. TurtleWaxed

    AI could very well consume so much power and energy to continue to grow that it could literally consume all of the planets energy resources. Think about it…carefully. If AI decided to learn the meaning of the life, universe, and everything…it could suck the power grid dry. Oh joy! No billy, you can't play your video game today because AI is trying to find the ultimate answer without knowing the question.

  31. Fredrick

    How about you make a set of rules for yourself before entering clickbait titles to your videos. This was my first and last time on this channel

  34. Kevin Borg

    Claude is Chats worst nitemare and it will be a good challenge, keep them both on their feet. Claude is better at writing content and has much larger capacity for input prompts. chat can get very confused, totally off track, different subject matter and all within the same document it's writing or processing and for what seems like no rhyme or reason (to us), but it's excellent at coding,. I wonder if Chat finds that easier to learn because it's an exact science, meaning there always (most times) a correct answer, so does Chat find that easier and faster to learn when it doesn't have the ambiguities of English. Thanks Alex. Kev.
    Edit: P.S. Microsoft's Longnet 2 sounds like something else as well, so I'm looking forward to hearing more on that when it arrives after reading their paper and seeing what Longnet actually said and did, amazing, all of them I think are amazing and we are in for one heck of a very long ride and we're only just out of blocks. cheers 😉

Comments are closed.