Skip to content

This groundbreaking NEW AI research tool beats ChatGPT every time



Learn how to publish 3+ papers in high-impact journals EVERY year: https://academicenglishnow.com/pr-yt If you’re new here, my …

35 thoughts on “This groundbreaking NEW AI research tool beats ChatGPT every time”

  1. I recently started using PaperGen for paper writing. The way it navigates around typical AI constraints has helped me come up with fresh perspectives. It feels much more engaging than standard tools! Have you tried anything like this?

  2. There's no way any tool can beat ChatGPT! Many claim that there are better AI tools, but they aren't even close to the truth. ChatGPT has proven to be the best, not only because of its vast knowledge base and accuracy in responses, but also because it supports over 50 different languages for translation. Leading platforms like the latest Google AI and Amazon AI also claim to be better, but when I tried them and asked questions in other languages, they simply said they were unable to perform the task, despite claiming otherwise. People often like to exaggerate, but the reality is that ChatGPT still holds the top spot.

  3. It’s not better than ChatGPT and it’s definitely not new. It’s just designed well for working with the specific job of searching through publications. It should have an impact factor score tracker maybe they’ll include that soon which would be good. Copilot is the worst LLM by far too which is another problem with SciSpace. Copilot should be removed from the marketplace completely. It sucks in here as well. Still the best publications specific interface but it needs work still.

  4. To refute the video’s claims, we can address several points about SI Space's advantages over ChatGPT, looking into AI capabilities, accuracy, and overall utility:

    1. **ChatGPT's Accuracy**: While the video emphasizes that SI Space doesn’t hallucinate like ChatGPT, it is misleading to claim that ChatGPT routinely fabricates information. GPT-4 (ChatGPT’s latest version) has improved significantly in factual accuracy, especially when using its own citation capabilities in specific implementations (e.g., ChatGPT with browsing or connected to external databases). ChatGPT's tendency to hallucinate can be mitigated through proper usage, such as clearly defining the tasks or combining it with authoritative data sources.

    2. **Access to Academic Papers**: The video asserts that SI Space has access to millions of papers, whereas ChatGPT does not. While it is true that ChatGPT does not directly access research databases without an API, ChatGPT’s utility is broader, as it can provide general knowledge, explain concepts in accessible language, and even help users critically assess existing research. For comprehensive research, ChatGPT can integrate with databases like PubMed, arXiv, or Google Scholar through plugins, expanding its academic utility.

    3. **Summarizing and Writing Features**: SI Space’s automated paper summarization and writing features are framed as superior, but tools integrated with ChatGPT, such as plugins, can also generate accurate summaries and citations when used in combination with external libraries or databases. Furthermore, ChatGPT’s ability to help users craft arguments, expand on ideas, and provide multiple perspectives—combined with its broader language model—makes it highly versatile in both academic and non-academic writing tasks.

    4. **Pricing**: The video positions SI Space’s premium plan as superior for academic use, but ChatGPT's subscription models (e.g., ChatGPT Plus) provide much broader functionality at competitive prices. ChatGPT also integrates with many third-party tools, offering comparable features to SI Space’s premium model at scale and across a range of industries beyond academia.

    5. **AI Detection**: The AI detector within SI Space is highlighted as essential for academic integrity. However, external AI detection tools are widely available and compatible with ChatGPT outputs. Thus, there’s no exclusive advantage to SI Space in this regard, especially since it’s easy to test ChatGPT-generated content for AI influence through existing detection services.

  5. It wastes a lot of time by referencing papers that are irrelevant most of the times. Its better to use one's search strategy skills in huge databases like EBSCO, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Internet Archives, etc. I agree that you can use it form coherent thoughts and strategies if you use your own brains 🧠 😉

Comments are closed.