Unlock Editor’s Digest for free
FT editor Roula Khalaf selects her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.
The British Labor government came to power facing a balancing act between its stated commitment to delivering a “new deal for workers” and delivering on its promise to be pro-growth and pro-business. Entrepreneurs have sounded the alarm about the impact of their milestone labor rights bill; the Federation of Small Businesses called it “rushed, chaotic and poorly planned.” But by tempering some promises and committing to more consultation, Labor has shown itself willing to listen to business, even at the risk of irritating its union allies. You should continue to pay attention to corporate concerns as you consider how the bill will be implemented. Above all, it must not undermine the priority of boosting the UK’s growth, productivity and competitiveness as it seeks to strengthen workers’ rights.
The largest in the government concession is to relax the day-one protection for employees against unfair dismissal that has been a centerpiece of its plans. Companies were worried about facing costly labor tribunals simply for laying off new employees who proved unsuitable, which could discourage hiring workers, especially for small businesses. There will now be a legal trial period during which employers will have to follow only a “lighter touch“dismissal process than the most onerous procedure that currently begins after two years of employment. A trial period will be consulted on, but ministers have signaled they are in favor of nine months, an apparent victory for pro-business voices in cabinet.
He bill will grant rights from day one to parental, paternity and bereavement leave for millions of workers, as the Labor Party had promised. Employers will have to pay statutory sick pay from the first day of illness, instead of three days as now. But some promised measures are moderated or postponed. The default right to flexible working will apply only where practical. TO “right to disconnectIt is now reasonable to expect that the prohibition on employers contacting staff outside of working hours will be addressed separately by a statutory code of practice.
Some abusive practices, including the “exploitative” use of zero-hours contracts, will rightly be curbed. More than 1 million people with such agreements will gain new rights to a contract that reflects a pattern of regular hours they accumulate over time, although workers, some of whom prefer zero hours, do not have to agree. Loopholes that companies have used to fire workers and then rehire them with worse pay or conditions will be closed, except where companies can demonstrate that they are at real risk of failure. Less positive is the repeal of Conservative legislation designed to preserve minimum levels of public services during strikes.
Many measures are subject to further consultation on the secondary legislation needed to implement them; some will not take effect before 2026. That means workers will have to wait two years for some rights and companies will face greater uncertainty. But it gives time to strike a balance between the rights of employees and employers, and iron out wrinkles in a bill that ministers rushed to publish within a 100-day deadline.
However, striking the right balance on labor rights is only one part of a bigger picture. Whether Labor lives up to its pro-business stance will also depend on avoiding overburdening businesses with excessive taxes in the budget. find money invest in infrastructure, training and skills, and develop a credible industrial strategy. After a rocky start, the government hopes to publish the employment bill, in addition to efforts to get a check in his Downing Street operation this week, marks a reset. Businesses, many of which gave Labor the benefit of the doubt because of their frustration with the Conservatives, still need some convincing about their growth credentials.