Skip to content

Unveiled: Secret to earning back your deposit as a tenant – and inspiring others to do the same!

‘Tenant urges others to follow suit’ after winning deposit claim against EHPL

A tenant from the Czech Republic, Adéla Koubová, has called on others to take action against Edinburgh Holiday and Party Lets (EHPL) after the Scottish House and Property Chamber ruled that she was owed her deposit back. The company, which is owned by businessman Mark Fortune, had argued it was operating vacation rentals rather than standard rental agreements. Housing advocates have questioned why further action is not being taken against the company in such cases. Koubová said she was still awaiting repayment.

Businessman’s legal status challenged

Fortune has been refused entry on the Scottish landlord’s register, and has suggested that the properties he operates are done so via limited partnerships rather than through him personally. However, the latest court ruling, as well as previously-reported material, suggests inconsistency over his role and legal status.

—————————————————-

Article Link
UK Artful Impressions Premiere Etsy Store
Sponsored Content View
90’s Rock Band Review View
Ted Lasso’s MacBook Guide View
Nature’s Secret to More Energy View
Ancient Recipe for Weight Loss View
MacBook Air i3 vs i5 View
You Need a VPN in 2023 – Liberty Shield View

  • by Andrew Picken
  • BBC News from Scotland

image source, Adéla Koubová

Screenshot,

The Scottish House and Property Chamber has ruled that Adéla Koubová must have her deposit returned

A tenant who took her landlord to court to get her deposit back has urged other tenants to follow suit.

Edinburgh Holiday and Party Lets (EHPL) was ordered to reimburse Adéla Koubová after a housing court ruled that she was owed the money back.

The flat is owned by Mark Fortune, a businessman who has been refused entry on the Scottish landlord’s register.

Adéla, who is from the Czech Republic, said she had stood up “for the other people in this situation.”

TO Housing Court Judgment Series They have now rejected EHPL’s argument that it is operating vacation rentals from Mr Fortune’s properties, and as such, people leaving there should get the same protections as ordinary rental agreements.

Housing advocates ask why more action is not being taken against the company.

Adéla moved to Edinburgh from the Czech Republic in January 2020 as part of an exchange program at the University of Edinburgh and found the flat in the city’s Bruntsfield Place through a Gumtree advertisement.

But after just one day at the property, which he said was freezing because of a hole in his bedroom window, he gave the EHPL representative four weeks’ notice but was later unable to get his deposit back.

image source, Adéla Koubová

“When I realized I lost my deposit I was sad, it was a lot of money to me,” he told BBC Scotland.

“But it’s been three years now, a lot of effort and stress in this process, but I’m doing it for the other people in this situation.

“There are people in these properties who are moving to Edinburgh for the first time and may not be aware of the situation.”

Adéla, who had support in her case from Scotland’s tenants’ union, Living Rent, said she was still waiting to be paid the £275 she is owed more than two months after the ruling.

image source, Deadline News

Screenshot,

The apartment in which Adéla lived is, according to the housing court ruling, owned by the controversial businessman Mark Fortune

She added: “I’m not sure if we’ll see the money, although the best prize was winning and hopefully through my experience we can inform other people that there is a way to prevent this from happening to them.”

He Judgment of the Chamber of Housing and Assets states that it “has no difficulty in concluding that both parties knew that this agreement was not for a vacation rental and did not intend for it to constitute one,” which means that the legal relationship between the parties was that of owner and tenant.

‘The position was often contradictory’

He has previously denied that he operates as a landlord and rents out flats.

The businessman said the properties were operated by limited partnerships, not him personally.

The latest court ruling said Fortune made filings on behalf of EHPL, of which he is a former director, and on several occasions “seemed to accidentally refer to himself as the owner.”

Screenshot,

The property at the center of the court’s ruling is in Bruntsfield Place, Edinburgh

He also added that his “position was often contradictory and therefore could not be treated as reliable.”

In 2021, a BBC Scotland investigation it discovered that the rooms in the flats owned by Mr Fortune were rented out under contracts that did not give tenants the same protection as residential agreements.

‘Start enforcing your own rules’

A Living Rent spokesman said most tenants did not have “the time or resources” to take landlords to housing court as they did Adéla.

He said: “Mark Fortune has been denied landlord registration and yet his properties have continued to be rented out across the city.

“Tenants face conditions unfit for human habitation and their deposits are improperly withheld while authorities fail to take action.”

The spokesman called on both Edinburgh City Council and Police Scotland to “start enforcing their own rules” on the issue.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-65855913.amp
—————————————————-