In this YouTube Shorts video, we’ll dive into the exciting face-off between DeepSeek and ChatGPT! Discover the strengths and …
In this YouTube Shorts video, we’ll dive into the exciting face-off between DeepSeek and ChatGPT! Discover the strengths and …
chatgpt best
ChatGPT just really really likes imperial units
Date or float
What this video hides is the fact that ChatGPT isn’t actually a proponent to which 9.11 > 9.9. If you ask the same question to ChatGPT, you’ll see that it begins with the proposition “9.11 is bigger than 9.9” and further implies that idea by employing the conjunction “even though” followed by 9.9 possibly appearing larger upon first glance, concluding with a demonstration to reason that 9.9 is actually larger than 9.11.
Here’s the conversation that I had with ChatGPT about this:
// start.
Me:
9.11 and 9.9 which one is bigger
ChatGPT:
9.11 is bigger than 9.9.
Even though 9.9 might look larger at first glance, when you compare decimal places:
• 9.11 = 9.110
• 9.9 = 9.900
Since 9.900 is greater than 9.110, 9.9 is actually the larger number.
Me:
I feel like this response can be phrased more concisely. You begin with proposing that 9.11 is bigger than 9.9, and further implying that statement by using the conjunction “Even though” followed by 9.9 possibly being larger, and then concluding with a demonstration to reason that 9.9 is larger than 9.11. I feel like this response can be phrased more concisely. You begin with proposing that 9.11 is bigger than 9.9, and further implying that statement by using the conjunction “Even though” followed by 9.9 possibly being larger, and then concluding with a demonstration to reason that 9.9 is larger than 9.11.
ChatGPT:
You’re absolutely right! Here’s a more concise and logically structured response:
9.9 is bigger than 9.11.
When comparing the two:
• 9.11 = 9.110
• 9.9 = 9.900
Since 9.900 > 9.110, 9.9 is greater than 9.11.
// end.
So while it may appear in this YTshort that ChatGPT is a proponent of the theory ‘9.11 is larger than 9.9’, upon further consulting the language model, it goes ahead and reconstructs the once incoherent and poorly structured response with one that actually aligns with the conclusions it produces. Could the purpose of this video be to hold to a strawman that the language model ChatGPT is, does propose, and promote the deepseek AI? I’m not completely sure, as there could be many reasons as to why this video was published or what its purpose is. Could I say that ChatGPT as the language model that it is has some issues with how it functions given simple and clear constructed instructional data? Absolutely, as ChatGPT shouldn’t be so non-concise as demonstrated. Is that to say that’s all there is to know? No, it’s not 100% known as to why ChatGPT would respond so non-concisely and admit to that, though it would imply heavily that that is all there is to know. What was the purpose of my entire piece to this comment section? Well, I wrote all of this to not only clear up misunderstandings and speculations about what truly is happening, or what truly is the case, but also to encourage the same kind of skeptic framework under a deductive logical framework to which an individual won’t immediately adhere to the allegations they face on a daily basis, and I hope it inspires critical thought and critical analysis in anyone who’s already read up to this point.
9,9>9,11 because 9,90 full 9,11 is still 9,11
9.9 can mean 9and 9/10
or 9 * 9
same with 9.11 so here chatgpt thinks it means multiplication and deepseek thinks it's decimal point
The towers are bigger though…
How to deal with bullies? Chatgpt:tell the Teachers. Deepseek:let them feel pain.
9.11 has more digits. It may not understand what you mean by “bigger”.
That's not true
Fake tho
9.9 sarebbe come 9.90 invece 9.11 è 9.11
well
string 9.11 is bigger than 9.9
Well, expect anything from ChatGPT.
Deepseek is best
Bruh My gpt replied 9.9 is bigger
both are right, it's all about the angle and purpose
In Software versions ChatGPT is right but mathematically its wrong
Shit im try it and fuck its real 😂
chatGPT told me 9.11-9.9=0.21😮
9.9>9.11
only if 9.90
So 9.90 is bigger than 9.10,
9.9 can have as many zeros and it won't make a difference
For example 9.9 and 9.90000000 have no difference
You need to specify that it's bigger in length of the number (number of digits) or size of the number (one with the highest value).
People need to study maths if they’re genuinely defending ChatGPT here.
The word is the flaw you have to say greater because if you say bigger it may consider length
9.11 > 9.09
If those are dates, then it makes sense: Sept 11 > Sept 9
Mojang uses chatgpt
I tried, the reel is a lie
I asked ChatGPT this, and it gave the same answer twice, but then it got it right. So I asked what I should comment, and it said it made a mistake and learned from it.
Gpt just programmer
Man, peoole are so ignorant. Both answers are right in different context
Is this even question 😭😭
9.9=9.90 and 9.90>>>>9.11 ???
Deepseek is correct
I think there is a leetcode problem where 11 in 9.11 means releases of a version, so 9.9 means 9 releases of version 9 so 11 will be bigger.
Chatgpt just adapted to us average IQ
Both answers are right but it depends on what point.
9.9 IS bigger than 9.11
It was an silly error at the new version it doesn't happen
Both right depend on what point
think about the number of people who died that day
deepseek is right
ChatGpt is always clever. Sometimes, ChatGpt mock us😂
9.9 > 9.11
Fake
hha i thouth the same but its actually make sense when u understand it chatgpt is thinking about gaming versions while deepseek is actually answered in math way not gaming way
Deepseek is shit after a while.
I asked GPT 4.5, here, the answer.
9.9 is bigger than 9.11.
This might seem confusing at first glance because "11" is greater than "9," but after the decimal point, each digit represents tenths, hundredths, and so on.
Here's the clarification:
9.9 means 9 + 0.9 (which is 9 + 90/100 = 9.90).
9.11 means 9 + 0.11 (which is 9 + 11/100).
Clearly, 0.90 is greater than 0.11, thus:
9.9 (or 9.90) > 9.11
Comments are closed.