Skip to content

How to Use ChatGPT to Ruin Your Legal Career



Maybe A.I. isn’t ready for primetime. Check out https://legaleagle.link/80000 for free career advice that will change the world …

26 thoughts on “How to Use ChatGPT to Ruin Your Legal Career”

  1. Clearly what’s happened is that they had a case they knew had no hope of winning, turned to chat gpt, possibly exhausted from looking for anything to shut this stupid client up, and got even the mildest hint that there was a reputable source of cases, saw it as an instant gotcha, and were so excited, possibly exhausted, and also very stupid, that they just shot that over to the airline. When they received a response from these foreign lawyers (perhaps feeling a bit superior to them?) They probably chalked it up to them being foreign and ignorant of federal cases, so sent an affidavit to the court anyway. Now being told by the court that the foreign lawyers were right, they doubled down out of an immense amount of stupidity, and submitted half-baked “bogus” cases hoping it would at least look like they did some research and weren’t absolute *BONEHEADS*.

  2. I went to Lewis & Clark and while I wasn't studying law, the law library at that campus is one of the most stunning places to study I've ever been to. The setting and architecture are beautiful, the inside is cozy and the library itself is extensive, especially supplemented by the Watzek library across the street.

  3. Hold on to your pants Mr. Lawyer. The US Supreme Court has once stated that Bankruptcy 11 USC is only as effective as the contractual parties agree, as the US Constitution provides that government can not abridge a contract absent fraud mistake or error. This means the stay imposed by a court can be objected to citing the provisions of the contract giving rights to a lender to accelerate on the note under certain conditions, such as foreclosure to satisfy the note. Another words if it is in the mortgage contract that a lender require full payment of the balance if a payment is missed and no payment is made the note holder can foreclose and no court can stay that action. There can be no such situation whereas a bankruptcy tolls any action as bankruptcy courts are unconstitutional on their face anyways.

  4. Chatgpt could not have made that up due to its programming, what most likely happened is that there was a mentioning in those cases of bankruptcy or some similar matter on the internet and because of that chat picked up on that and put into the case even though those mentioned cases had nothing to do with the case in which the information was sought. If people make up a case and put it into the internet chat will pick up on that as being an existing case not that it makes it up out of whole cloth. Chatgpt is out standing but you have to know how it works and what its limitations are and it works out just fine. Oh and it will soon replace 90% of the work load of lawyers and maybe even the whole of a lawyer's work and hopefully even judges, and prosecutors work it doesn't have a political opinion and does not worry about getting paid or who is elected. It has no feelings.

  5. All of this because a flight attendend bumped a cart into someone.

    Now maybe the damages were real. I ain't ginna dig deep into it because that could violate privacy. I just find it funny.

  6. I used ChatGPT once to create a short text on various travel destinations for grade 7 students. Even I made sure to verify the information in the snippets.

    Hard to believe actual lawyers wouldn't even double check for real cases 😂

  7. You dont even need a legal understanding to not fall for this, just a working brain. You can literally get chatGPT to say anything. Just confidently tell it its wrong and it'll be like "I apologize for being inaccurate, youre right that …". You can easily get it to contradict itself back to back

  8. Just because some people don't know how to use a tool doesn't make the tool useless. Understanding how a technology works is a key to being able to use it properly. GPT models are just one of those things that people confuse for magic. Not looking up the cases they were blindly referencing is a mind-boggling level of insanity, beyond your average ignorance/carelessness.

  9. Holy movie "IF," guy looks like a blend of Ryan Reynolds and John Krasinski.

    Also, the content was entertaining and informative. It's my first experience with this channel. Subscribed.

Comments are closed.