Skip to content

Is Your Politeness Costing ChatGPT Millions of Dollars? | Vantage with Palki Sharma | N18G



Is Your Politeness Costing ChatGPT Millions of Dollars? | Vantage with Palki Sharma | N18G OpenAI CEO Sam Altman revealed …

24 thoughts on “Is Your Politeness Costing ChatGPT Millions of Dollars? | Vantage with Palki Sharma | N18G”

  1. Thank you @Firstpost for the interesting report … this is hilarious. The answer is NOT to stop saying "please" and "thank you", but to stop using A.I. to write our emails, reports, and school essays. People have got it doing their thinking for them. It's just rotting people's brains =)

  2. No, it’s *not true* that saying "thank you" to me (or any AI assistant) costs a lot of money or significantly impacts climate change. Here’s why:

    ### 1. *Cost of AI Responses*
    – Running AI models like me does require computational power, but the cost per interaction (like a "thank you") is **extremely low**—fractions of a cent. Companies like OpenAI optimize efficiency to keep costs minimal.
    – Unlike human customer support, AI doesn’t incur salaries or infrastructure costs per message.

    ### 2. *Climate Impact of AI*
    – AI systems do consume energy, but the carbon footprint of a single text interaction (including your "thank you") is *negligible**—roughly **0.001–0.01 grams of CO₂* (equivalent to a few seconds of breathing).
    – Data centers powering AI increasingly use *renewable energy* and efficiency improvements to reduce emissions.
    – For context, **one Google search emits ~0.2g CO₂**, and **streaming 1 hour of Netflix emits ~36g CO₂**—far more than a text exchange with AI.

    ### 3. *Why the Myth Exists*
    – Some viral claims exaggerate the impact of digital actions (e.g., "stop sending emails to save the planet"). While reducing waste helps, AI interactions are a *tiny drop in the ocean* compared to major emitters like transportation, industry, or video streaming.

    ### 4. *What Actually Matters for Climate Change*
    If you’re concerned about digital carbon footprints, focus on:
    *Streaming less HD video* (or lowering resolution).
    *Extending device lifespans* (manufacturing electronics has a big footprint).
    – **Supporting clean energy policies**.

    ### Bottom Line
    Your "thank you" costs *almost nothing* and has **no meaningful climate impact**. Gratitude is always free—and appreciated! 😊

    (Sources: Stanford AI Index, CarbonBrief, MIT Tech Review)

  3. Guys please put your mind into it.

    The message is to use it EFFICIENTLY for your needs. Don't forget that cpus are running all the time.

    The amount of electricity we use daily, added to charge, in cities especially.

    Look at the state of our world, and just think about it. It's not about tech billionaires, it's about "how we consume" what's available to us

    Just like resources are limited, every functioning being or machine needs energy to charge it.

    Please use it wisely. Almost every application software has ai installed in it. Govt or private softwares, nature may always prevail. Let's do our best !

  4. A lesson lost on India where a large number never learnt to to converse politely. Too many Indians are very conscious of social pecking order. Obsequious to those they see above them, rude to those they perceive as inferior and completely unaware that it is possible to be polite to random strangers.

    A simple example, try waiting in a queue without sticking to the person in front of you and watch people squeeze into the middle without even bothering to see if other people are in line.

  5. So now they're bent on eroding a minority of well-mannered and grateful people left in the world …

    Better discourage people from asking frivolous questions than putting them under guilt for merely exercising politeness which is already a scarce show.🤷🏻‍♀️

  6. I found myself using curiosities with chat when I first started using it, then started forcing a habit to just stick to the details…it's really what both the AI and me really care about.

  7. So me saying please and thank you is bad, but gpt4 giving me an entire short essay response to my simple questions is fine? Uh, dont think it's me that's the problem.

Comments are closed.