Skip to content

Shocking Revelation: Disturbing Rise in Infant Mortality Following Controversial Texas Abortion Law!

Title: Texas Abortion Restrictions Linked to Rise in Infant Mortality: A Closer Look

Introduction:
Texas’ stringent abortion restrictions, among the strictest in the nation, have raised concerns about their impact on infant mortality rates. According to preliminary data from the Texas Department of State Health Services, there has been a significant increase in infant deaths, particularly those caused by severe genetic and birth defects. The implementation of these restrictions coincided with a reversal of a decade-long decline in child deaths. While some argue that the rise in births in the state could partially explain the increase in mortality rates, obstetricians and gynecologists specializing in high-risk pregnancies believe that Texas’ restrictive abortion laws played a significant role.

The Devastating Impact of Strict Abortion Laws:
The impact of Texas’ strict abortion laws is becoming increasingly evident. With abortions banned beyond six weeks of pregnancy, except in cases where the life of the mother is at risk, women are being forced to continue non-viable pregnancies. This includes pregnancies with severe genetic abnormalities, birth defects, or life-threatening conditions. As a result, the burden of carrying these pregnancies to term falls on women who may be subjected to emotional and physical trauma, as well as increased health risks.

Significant Rise in Infant Mortality:
In 2022, Texas witnessed a surge in infant mortality rates, with 2,200 babies dying—an increase of 227 deaths, or 11.5%, compared to the previous year. Infant deaths caused by severe genetic and birth defects saw a staggering spike of 21.6%. This alarming trend reflects a sharp contrast to the nearly decade-long decline in child deaths experienced in the state between 2014 and 2021. Furthermore, it is important to note that the rise in births in Texas, estimated at 3% following the abortion ban, does not fully explain the significant increase in infant mortality rates.

Expert Perspectives and Testimonies:
Numerous obstetricians and gynecologists who specialize in high-risk pregnancies have voiced their concerns about the impact of Texas’ restrictive abortion laws on infant mortality. Dr. Erika Werner, Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Tufts Medical Center, emphasized that the increase in deaths was expected as a result of non-viable pregnancies being carried to term. These experts believe that the Texas abortion laws have deprived women of the option to terminate pregnancies that would not develop into normal, healthy children. Testimonies shared during a lawsuit filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights further highlight the emotional trauma and loss experienced by women who were forced to continue these pregnancies.

The Need for Clarification:
The lawsuit aims to bring attention to the issue of forcing women to carry terminal and high-risk pregnancies to term. Plaintiffs, including women who suffered difficult pregnancies or experienced infant deaths, are urging the courts to clarify when medical exceptions can be made to the state’s abortion ban. The state’s defense argues that the plaintiffs’ doctors misinterpreted the law and failed to provide adequate care. However, critics contend that the language in Texas’ abortion laws is vague, leaving doctors uncertain about the scope of medical care they can provide.

The Potential Dangers of Restrictive Abortion Laws:
Experts warn that restrictive abortion laws have detrimental effects on both babies and mothers. The high maternal mortality rate in the United States, even prior to these restrictions, underscores the need for greater access to obstetric care. Compelling women to carry nonviable pregnancies to term exposes them to unnecessary risks, both physical and emotional. Medical professionals stress the dangers of subjecting women to the risks associated with pregnancy without the compensatory benefit of bringing a baby home.

Conclusion:
Texas’ strict abortion restrictions have yielded concerning consequences, notably a surge in infant mortality rates, particularly among babies with severe genetic and birth defects. The ban on abortions beyond six weeks of pregnancy has forced women to continue nonviable pregnancies, resulting in emotional trauma and increased health risks. The recent rise in births in Texas cannot justify the significant increase in infant deaths. Expert testimonies highlight the urgent need for clarification and changes in restrictive abortion laws to protect the health and well-being of both women and infants. Ultimately, the focus should be on providing appropriate medical care and support to individuals faced with challenging and heart-wrenching decisions in the context of complex pregnancies.

—————————————————-

Article Link
UK Artful Impressions Premiere Etsy Store
Sponsored Content View
90’s Rock Band Review View
Ted Lasso’s MacBook Guide View
Nature’s Secret to More Energy View
Ancient Recipe for Weight Loss View
MacBook Air i3 vs i5 View
You Need a VPN in 2023 – Liberty Shield View



CNN

Texas’ abortion restrictions, some of the strictest in the country, may be causing a surge in infant mortality as women are forced to carry non-viable pregnancies to term.

Some 2,200 babies died in Texas in 2022, an increase of 227 deaths, or 11.5%, from the previous year, according to preliminary infant mortality data from the Texas Department of State Health Services obtained by CNN via a public records request. Infant deaths caused by severe genetic and birth defects increased by 21.6%. That spike reversed a decline of nearly a decade. Between 2014 and 2021, child deaths fell by almost 15%.

In 2021, Texas prohibited abortions beyond six weeks of pregnancy. when the supreme court overturned federal abortion rights the following summer, a triggering law in the state banned all abortions except those intended to protect the life of the mother.

The increase in deaths could be explained in part by the fact that more babies are being born in Texas. One recent report found that in the last nine months of 2022, the state saw nearly 10,000 more births than expected before the abortion ban, an estimated 3% increase.

But several obstetricians and gynecologists who focus on high-risk pregnancies told CNN that Texas’ strict abortion laws likely contributed to the rise in infant deaths.

“We all knew that the infant mortality rate would go up, because a lot of these terminations were for pregnancies that didn’t develop into normal, healthy children,” said Dr. Erika Werner, chair of obstetrics and gynecology at Tufts Medical Center. “That’s exactly what we were all worried about.”

The issue of forcing women to carry out terminal and often high-risk pregnancies is at the center of a lawsuit filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights, with several women, who suffered difficult pregnancies or infant deaths shortly after giving birth. to birth, testifying in Travis County. cut this week.

One witness became so emotional while testifying Wednesday that she started vomiting on the witness stand.

After the court called a recess, she explained that the reaction is a response to the emotional trauma she endured: “I throw up when certain parts happen that make my body remember.”

Another sobbed as she described being afraid to visit a Texas doctor after receiving an out-of-state abortion. A third of her spoke tearfully about waiting for her baby’s heart to stop beating so doctors could give her a desperately needed abortion.

Before the recent restrictions on abortion, Texas prohibited the procedure after 20 weeks. This law gave parents more time to learn crucial information about fetal brain formation and organ development, which doctors begin to assess at around 15 weeks.

Samantha Casiano, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit filed against Texas, wished she had more time to make the decision.

“If I could have had an abortion in that time, I think it would have meant a lot to me because my daughter wouldn’t have suffered,” Casiano told CNN after testifying Wednesday.

Anti-abortion protesters gather in the rotunda of the Capitol in Austin, Texas, in March 2021.

When Casiano was 20 weeks pregnant, a routine scan revealed devastating news: her baby would be stillborn or die shortly after birth.

The fetus had anencephaly, a rare birth defect that prevents the brain and skull from developing during pregnancy. Babies with this condition are often stillborn, although they sometimes live for a few hours or days. Many women across the country facing the prospect are choosing abortion, two obstetricians and gynecologists told CNN.

But Casiano lived in Texas, where state legislators recently banned most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. He couldn’t afford to travel out of state for the procedure.

“You have no options. You will have to move forward with your pregnancy,” Casiano’s doctor told him, he claimed in the lawsuit.

In March, Casiano gave birth to their daughter Halo. After gasping for air for four hours, the baby died, Casiano said during his testimony Wednesday.

“All I could do was fight to get air. I had to watch my daughter go from pink to red to purple. From being warm to cold,” Casiano said. “I kept telling myself and my baby that I’m so sorry this happened to you.”

Casiano and 14 others, including two doctors, are the plaintiffs in the lawsuit. They allege that the ban on abortion has denied them or their patients access to necessary obstetric care. The plaintiffs are asking the courts to clarify when doctors can make medical exceptions to the state ban.

Casiano and two other plaintiffs testified Wednesday hoping to deliver healthy babies, but instead learned their lives or pregnancies were in danger.

    Plaintiffs Anna Zargarian, Lauren Miller, Lauren Hall and Amanda Zurawski at the Texas State Capitol after filing a lawsuit on behalf of Texans harmed by the state's abortion ban March 7 in Austin, Texas.

“This was supposed to be a scanning day,” Casiano told the court. “It escalated until I found out my daughter was going to die.”

Lawyers representing the state argued Wednesday that the plaintiffs’ doctors were at fault, saying they misinterpreted the law and failed to provide adequate care for such high-risk pregnancies.

“Plaintiffs will not and cannot provide any evidence that any medical provider in the state of Texas is prosecuted or penalized for performing an abortion using the emergency medical exemption,” an attorney said during the state’s opening statement.

Kylie Beaton, another plaintiff, also had to watch her baby die. Beaton, who did not testify this week, learned during a 20-week scan that something was wrong with her baby’s brain, according to her lawsuit.

The doctor diagnosed the fetus with alobar holoprosencephaly, a condition in which the two hemispheres of the brain do not divide correctly. Babies with this condition are often stillborn or die shortly after birth.

Beaton’s doctor told her that he could not perform an abortion unless she was seriously ill or the fetus’s heart stopped. Beaton and her husband sought an abortion out of state. However, the fetus’s head was enlarged due to her condition, and the only clinic that performed an abortion charged up to $15,000. Beaton and her husband couldn’t afford it.

Instead, Beaton gave birth to a son she named Grant. The baby was constantly crying, not eating and unable to stand upright for fear of putting too much pressure on its head, according to the suit. Four days later, Grant died.

Amanda Zurawski of Austin, Texas, center, is the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.

Experts say abortion bans in states like Texas increase the risk for both babies and mothers.

Maternal mortality has long been a top concern for doctors and health rights activists. Even before the Supreme Court decision, the United States had the highest maternal mortality rate among wealthy nations, A study found.

Amanda Zurawski, the lawsuit lead plaintiff, testified Wednesday that her water broke at 18 weeks pregnant, putting her at high risk of a life-threatening infection. Zurawski’s baby probably wouldn’t survive.

But the fetus still had a heartbeat, so the doctors said they couldn’t terminate the pregnancy. She received an emergency abortion only after her condition worsened and she went into septic shock.

Zurawski described during Wednesday’s hearing how her family visited the hospital, fearing it was the last time they would see her. Zurawski has argued that if she had been able to have an abortion, her life would not have been in danger in the same way.

“I blame the people who support these bans,” Zurawski said.

zurawski previously mentioned The language in Texas abortion laws is “incredibly vague, leaving doctors grappling with what they can and can’t do, what medical care they can and can’t provide.”

Pregnancy is dangerous, and forcing a woman to carry a nonviable pregnancy to term is unnecessarily risky when it’s clear the baby won’t survive, argued Dr. Mae-Lan Winchester, an Ohio-based maternal-fetal medicine specialist.

“Pregnancy is one of the most dangerous things a person will go through,” Winchester said. “Exposing yourself to that risk without any benefit of bringing a baby home at the end, is… risking maternal morbidity and mortality for nothing.”

—————————————————-