Unlock the editor’s summary for free
Roula Khalaf, editor of the FT, selects her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.
The head of Brands and Spencer It faces its payment package of up to £ 1.06 million after a sustained cyber attack knocked down the actions of the United Kingdom retailers in more than a tenth.
It is expected that Stuart Machin, who was appointed Executive Director in 2022, loses around £ 831,000 in a performance action plan and £ 233,000 in a deferred bonus awarded the same year and granted in July. Both have been affected by the 14 percent drop in the price of M&S shares since the Piracy incident April 22.
The drop in the price of shares has reduced prizes to £ 5.06mn and £ 1.42 million respectively, at the close of the negotiation in London on Friday.
Machin is also losses in nursing paper of approximately 1.4mn of its remaining actions maintained under long -term incentive plans and through deferred bonds, which could bring its total potential reached to date to approximately £ 2.4mn.
The FTSE 100 group said on Tuesday that some personal data of customers were stolen as part of the cyber attack that has left it unable to accept online orders for three weeks and led to empty shelves in some stores.

Machin’s payment for the year until March 31 should not be beaten since the cyber attack occurred after the company’s financial year ended and the retailer is expected to publish solid annual results.
However, the members of the Board can exercise discretion in reducing bonds in the light of cyber attack, according to two senior remuneration advisors. They added that the bonus and the long -term results of this year will probably receive a blow after a challenging first quarter for M&S.
Thomas Bolger, a senior administration analyst of Minerva-Manifest, who advises shareholders, said that “the remuneration committee should probably be advanced to the consequences in indicating that they will use their discretion”, although “it is too early to say if the Naupca is appropriate because they must have additional investigations.”
“We are more likely to see an announcement next year when they report on the financial year during which the cyber security attack took place,” he added.
M&S said that Machin’s remuneration “was always based on the achievement of the company’s objectives and financial performance” and “most of the benefits are long -term and its value will always reflect the price of the shares.”
A person close to the Executive said he is not driven by his payment package and his focus was to revive the retailer’s fortune.
However, chaos of recent weeks threatens to interrupt your planned change.
The company informs the results of the whole year on Wednesday and is expected to update the market on the consequences of hack.
Analysts forecast a 17 percent increase in profits before taxes at £ 840 million for the year until March 31. However, “what would probably have been a strong start to [this year]Without a doubt, he will be eclipsed by the cyber attack on Easter, ”said Kate Calvert in Investte.
M&S sales increased by 14.7 percent year -on -year in 12 weeks until April 19, according to Nielseniq data, days before the company revealed the violation.
Clive Black, a retail wore analyst, said: “What is clear to us is that this has a severe impact on the performance of the first quarter, hundreds of millions of pounds, and, by definition, a remarkable impact for the result of the full year by 2026”.

M&S may have lost revenues to date by a total of more than 75 million, according to the extrapolation of their daily sales online, and the losses could increase to approximately 125 million if online operations do not restart at the end of the month, analysts said.
The attack on its systems also left M&S struggling to keep the shelves supplied in some food stores, with black estimating that approximately every 10 percent of the reduction in availability results in approximately 15 million sales lost per week.
“There are some people who simply have not gone to M&S because they think that availability is not there,” he added. “The glorious climate of the last seven weeks will mean that M&S will be very frustrated on the last month.”
Beyond lost sales, work costs have also been triggered, since some systems were turned off and the retailer had to write the advisors to help him restore their operations.
M&S could claim for losses of up to £ 100mn Of its cyber insurers, Financial Times reported this week, which provides some relief, although some analysts do not expect this to relieve all pain.
Calvert said that while the management team has focused correctly on keeping the business in operation, the city will be anxious to understand next week the impact on the broader transformation of the business.
Morgan Stanley analysts echoed those points of view, saying in a note this week that “the highest risk would be if the interruption slows down the rhythm of the transformation of the middle of the M&S period.”
A key part of the next phase of the M&S change, after successfully modernizing its ranges and stores and sites that were not lucrative, is based on improving background operations, as more automation in its distribution centers and a better purchasing application, areas that have been interrupted.
The Black of Shore Capital said: “They have gone from a highly automated operational platform and in fact autocomplete to a manual.”
Despite this, he believes that the performance of M&S in the financial year 2024-2025 should be the reference point of future results instead of the current year, ruined by their treatment with cybercriminals.
“They had an absolutely fantastic year with market participation gains in food and clothing before the attack … healthy margins, full price sales, very strong cash generation.”